Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2303607ybv; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:59:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw5W2CUqvQvuJYytAJj2ECUuwMJCFft1TXUcbadhHx6w896H9FBa8JpJfi8qETMcNg0LoUZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1643:: with SMTP id h3mr4082609otr.70.1581724775163; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:59:35 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581724775; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NuAnCsVO2eQcsfSLf0Ot4MPTX4Ip6J9Gktv4JW2YkUohwPwRFZmp2jviYtDMcZGUko eDmnr2fgnG5HrLYWX28IGgdrrQrxNvENlDZ9yNWj1jRvdUPwiVsaQ1/rfLvsxrwSYWCq uViz1hgDSDB9sk+L+FSIQKuoEVfVzSZy5ghi6a0pT7R+Bi561lS/aI19H0YuUkig6DqX vdbudB7KeiwIegtFWWAWtWuwlJVsSpaE00AC1ocd1Fs0jaP8EOh8UiaX9a/u78WHS3/b GXfPW8tejV/GvXH5P3LWACzJr4ugiciBNNPSO4cVHm7guEgHnE5jpKe45pB8+Eq62FeA vqHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=zWyIjdCp+KibmYUrqgij0dZJWaFxs5+aw0niVq6KsSM=; b=dFoRaky2bCKViL1DElMq72tmH1u0Wkbcrd5xUUi1dQn87/iNmp/xEyD4zpRczN2qNx mEz2akw6XemaeE1wBmfZYgIWOuoBtIU5dsuUO6/gZd1baiSOJS2zZAKT8EXvagrSxc50 q2C0kMJGhkC+CuDBnHiq3/T5toFIMpmEM/4WnBjONGuWCg8Id77xEBqoG9tT57E0EVel ZoDGf97wzutP3CUs7SWjPIpWiI15wPCYDgWtyGBjc7LAN2WUHp1ybe7SigvQ01syXpyk pRRMJQvfcptgLi069QrR+X0HdzLvPO3MvwFOMeX9gHskWs/p74qjgZ9Oq3zIkA5jBWYd +fkQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=HSqcqB34; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s9si3379823oij.78.2020.02.14.15.59.23; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:59:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=HSqcqB34; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728672AbgBNX5r (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:57:47 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37654 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727845AbgBNX5q (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:57:46 -0500 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.c.hoisthospitality.com (unknown [62.84.152.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7331E24677; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:57:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581724665; bh=I3I+R5oUSeBTQfyEXtpXDf6v2AzOh3dI8ZD6PsU2X4A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HSqcqB34J0F/npSPeFlGk/yPMGtJyEm64PYHxwBWwWA3rZakGqz105pJf7A979Nwx McA9/JFCq4MJtXVAjGvCC6tOzHFVVz7oPJTKWy2P0h+wU5toYCJrmohufT9VsJzINX 4kQv8aTiiMSo3A40EvDNv4Q0YsPebqyboTLw8Dw4= From: paulmck@kernel.org To: rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/30] rcu: Tighten rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected() check Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:56:03 -0800 Message-Id: <20200214235607.13749-26-paulmck@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20200214235536.GA13364@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20200214235536.GA13364@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Paul E. McKenney" The ->nocb_lock lockdep assertion is currently guarded by cpu_online(), which is incorrect for no-CBs CPUs, whose callback lists must be protected by ->nocb_lock regardless of whether or not the corresponding CPU is online. This situation could result in failure to detect bugs resulting from failing to hold ->nocb_lock for offline CPUs. This commit therefore removes the cpu_online() guard. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h index 3846519..70b3c0f 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h @@ -1579,8 +1579,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(struct rcu_data *rdp, static void rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(struct rcu_data *rdp) { lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); - if (rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist) && - cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) + if (rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist)) lockdep_assert_held(&rdp->nocb_lock); } -- 2.9.5