Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2312543ybv; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:09:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqycRcx4oIrNjPPlC+gtA8IGXNJt5WQzk2ssFm+wXtnQRio4Ko/07fL/DyPCAXEEj7ej06cQ X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7083:: with SMTP id l3mr4097840otj.193.1581725362052; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:09:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581725362; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dTEO3+xg0hG+RAKqMi3xMq4/s//toP9LwA1YSRFNoOEAiQ3BnlS4uIcqf3SfULwsjs bZFkEIZDN2PFrUxxtuJvntbV1PwZ8l9Acl4shGqAsZ6gXCQXJCu3gMZ6lpDzie7w/KbV DpfuchcmSLhrapVeDWNgfV5Hb4+JMz2jpd/Djk816XuvfAeN6Q4xIrWr5Nv6X+rQZujt A9mNrW5sDs3OVTuWkC+0WjpWaBvHjaMljFiLrRNd++0u+vNNJuiXG+iGywK759OwnoD6 BZaWogG0J4GaGJib9U/p3tdFjSPkFt0ITZ9G3hTTLIHGAivnfmX4k2NMt1vgcICtDbZv 539Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=+2GMS1YDzljkM2rvV/khytzv209rsAnK2iNgfpTRkJs=; b=WCpqYjogCGbKLEVED4drRCtRWkD53/EfHqfiEyONTNCaOSJ8I0LPHVxqj5MvWXvD95 r6Sl2sDQUESMQTnqWPwkoHj2fl+YoxIlIg8jVovJEZGVUROYUc6TxF7+sC930AjcIlCd 00HJOTBIU1ZNMUdkFn4figsLgep0X/izM6v6Ti9+qru2SGPn8ewE6WVqhsMWrOXaxgUW eqtUxVvynbdsbJR7kqUhS5rUAUPkPvy43y0acZTz9ChB24C3ijiSHsmha2Lvvv/y8HYg 4yDLN8ws/Pdn0/YqcwMz6bzcCLeS44PbHNi2CVjlpKGctjb/1IlfmNz2pOpSLsSzxWOs NBpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=MjQYVyby; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i3si3724801otc.272.2020.02.14.16.09.09; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:09:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=MjQYVyby; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728642AbgBNX53 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:57:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37330 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728202AbgBNX51 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:57:27 -0500 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.c.hoisthospitality.com (unknown [62.84.152.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BE36222C4; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:57:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581724647; bh=Nk4+jqw8EBoCH7Z8k70fREwvdIqjrxQXbTMgrJECdbA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MjQYVybysNAR9bcLqw0RvDjST/uS8p/g4MO7aA6MYSEUlNy8UKby/joVIDwGWXily bDXfSmjyvw0DaPgeFYmX5FPPHnOVY67rqUSPwCGF1wxwC/8xUkcuYIlIQ408or93ih TWCOneMJChVerfWr6FVmTB/8SeHn387z5v6QLlBo= From: paulmck@kernel.org To: rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, Amol Grover , "Paul E . McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/30] rculist: Add brackets around cond argument in __list_check_rcu macro Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:55:58 -0800 Message-Id: <20200214235607.13749-21-paulmck@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20200214235536.GA13364@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20200214235536.GA13364@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Amol Grover Passing a complex lockdep condition to __list_check_rcu results in false positive lockdep splat due to incorrect expression evaluation. For example, a lockdep check condition `cond1 || cond2` is evaluated as `!cond1 || cond2 && !rcu_read_lock_any_held()` which, according to operator precedence, evaluates to `!cond1 || (cond2 && !rcu_read_lock_any_held())`. This would result in a lockdep splat when cond1 is false and cond2 is true which is logically incorrect. Signed-off-by: Amol Grover Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- include/linux/rculist.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h index 9f313e4..8214cdc 100644 --- a/include/linux/rculist.h +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h @@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ static inline void INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(struct list_head *list) #define __list_check_rcu(dummy, cond, extra...) \ ({ \ check_arg_count_one(extra); \ - RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!cond && !rcu_read_lock_any_held(), \ + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(cond) && !rcu_read_lock_any_held(), \ "RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!"); \ - }) + }) #else #define __list_check_rcu(dummy, cond, extra...) \ ({ check_arg_count_one(extra); }) -- 2.9.5