Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   paulmck@kernel.org
To:     rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org,
        jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
        fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
        Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Add missing annotation for exit_tasks_rcu_finish()
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:25:20 -0800
Message-Id: <20200215002520.15746-3-paulmck@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200215002446.GA15663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
References: <20200215002446.GA15663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>

Sparse reports a warning at exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void)

|warning: context imbalance in exit_tasks_rcu_finish()
|- wrong count at exit

To fix this, this commit adds a __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu).
Given that exit_tasks_rcu_finish() does actually call __srcu_read_lock(),
this not only fixes the warning but also improves on the readability of
the code.

Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/update.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index a04fe54..ede656c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
 }
 
 /* Do the srcu_read_unlock() for the above synchronize_srcu().  */
-void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void)
+void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
 	__srcu_read_unlock(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu, current->rcu_tasks_idx);
-- 
2.9.5