Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:18:16 -0800
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To:     Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc:     iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
        Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/11] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate function
Message-ID: <20200214171816.5e68ebaa@jacob-builder>
In-Reply-To: <56c3222f-0457-8e1f-73aa-0360f49d66a7@redhat.com>
References: <1571946904-86776-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
        <1571946904-86776-12-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
        <56c3222f-0457-8e1f-73aa-0360f49d66a7@redhat.com>
Organization: OTC
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Eric,

Thanks for the review, I somehow missed it, my apologies. See comments
below.

On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:28:37 +0100
Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Jacob,
> 
> On 10/24/19 9:55 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
> > vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation support at IOMMU API and
> > driver level. This patch adds Intel VT-d specific function to
> > implement iommu passdown invalidate API for shared virtual address.
> > 
> > The use case is for supporting caching structure invalidation
> > of assigned SVM capable devices. Emulated IOMMU exposes queue
> > invalidation capability and passes down all descriptors from the
> > guest to the physical IOMMU.
> > 
> > The assumption is that guest to host device ID mapping should be
> > resolved prior to calling IOMMU driver. Based on the device handle,
> > host IOMMU driver can replace certain fields before submit to the
> > invalidation queue.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 170
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 170
> > insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index 5fab32fbc4b4..a73e76d6457a
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > @@ -5491,6 +5491,175 @@ static void
> > intel_iommu_aux_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > aux_domain_remove_dev(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev); }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * 2D array for converting and sanitizing IOMMU generic TLB
> > granularity to
> > + * VT-d granularity. Invalidation is typically included in the
> > unmap operation
> > + * as a result of DMA or VFIO unmap. However, for assigned device
> > where guest
> > + * could own the first level page tables without being shadowed by
> > QEMU. In  
> above sentence needs to be rephrased.
Yes, how about this:
/*
 * 2D array for converting and sanitizing IOMMU generic TLB granularity
to
 * VT-d granularity. Invalidation is typically included in the unmap
operation
 * as a result of DMA or VFIO unmap. However, for assigned devices guest
 * owns the first level page tables. Invalidations of translation
caches in the
 * guest are trapped and passed down to the host.
 *
 * vIOMMU in the guest will only expose first level page tables,
therefore
 * we do not include IOTLB granularity for request without PASID
(second level). *
 * For example, to find the VT-d granularity encoding for IOTLB

> > + * this case there is no pass down unmap to the host IOMMU as a
> > result of unmap
> > + * in the guest. Only invalidations are trapped and passed down.
> > + * In all cases, only first level TLB invalidation (request with
> > PASID) can be
> > + * passed down, therefore we do not include IOTLB granularity for
> > request
> > + * without PASID (second level).
> > + *
> > + * For an example, to find the VT-d granularity encoding for
> > IOTLB  
> for example
sounds better.

> > + * type and page selective granularity within PASID:
> > + * X: indexed by iommu cache type
> > + * Y: indexed by enum iommu_inv_granularity
> > + * [IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_ADDR]
> > + *
> > + * Granu_map array indicates validity of the table. 1: valid, 0:
> > invalid
> > + *
> > + */
> > +const static int
> > inv_type_granu_map[IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_NR] = {
> > +	/* PASID based IOTLB, support PASID selective and page
> > selective */  
> I would rather use the generic terminology, ie. IOTLB invalidation
> supports PASID and ADDR granularity
Understood. My choice of terminology is based on VT-d spec and this is
VT-d only code. Perhaps add the generic terms by the side? i.e.
/*
 * PASID based IOTLB invalidation: PASID selective (per PASID),
 * page selective (address granularity)
 */

> > +	{0, 1, 1},> +	/* PASID based dev TLBs, only support
> > all PASIDs or single PASID */  
> Device IOLTB invalidation supports DOMAIN and PASID granularities
> > +	{1, 1, 0},
> > +	/* PASID cache */  
> PASID cache invalidation support DOMAIN and PASID granularity
> > +	{1, 1, 0}
> > +};
> > +
> > +const static u64
> > inv_type_granu_table[IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_NR] =
> > {
> > +	/* PASID based IOTLB */
> > +	{0, QI_GRAN_NONG_PASID, QI_GRAN_PSI_PASID},
> > +	/* PASID based dev TLBs */
> > +	{QI_DEV_IOTLB_GRAN_ALL, QI_DEV_IOTLB_GRAN_PASID_SEL, 0},
> > +	/* PASID cache */
> > +	{QI_PC_ALL_PASIDS, QI_PC_PASID_SEL, 0},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline int to_vtd_granularity(int type, int granu, u64
> > *vtd_granu)  
> nit: this looks a bit weird to me to manipulate an u64 here. Why not
> use a int
Yes, should be int.
> > +{
> > +	if (type >= IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR || granu >=
> > IOMMU_INV_GRANU_NR ||
> > +		!inv_type_granu_map[type][granu])
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	*vtd_granu = inv_type_granu_table[type][granu];> +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u64 to_vtd_size(u64 granu_size, u64 nr_granules)
> > +{
> > +	u64 nr_pages = (granu_size * nr_granules) >>
> > VTD_PAGE_SHIFT; +
> > +	/* VT-d size is encoded as 2^size of 4K pages, 0 for 4k, 9
> > for 2MB, etc.
> > +	 * IOMMU cache invalidate API passes granu_size in bytes,
> > and number of
> > +	 * granu size in contiguous memory.
> > +	 */
> > +	return order_base_2(nr_pages);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > +static int intel_iommu_sva_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > +		struct device *dev, struct
> > iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info) +{
> > +	struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
> > +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> > +	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	int cache_type;
> > +	u8 bus, devfn;
> > +	u16 did, sid;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +	u64 size;
> > +
> > +	if (!inv_info || !dmar_domain ||
> > +		inv_info->version !=
> > IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE_INFO_VERSION_1)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (!dev || !dev_is_pci(dev))
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, &bus, &devfn);
> > +	if (!iommu)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	info = iommu_support_dev_iotlb(dmar_domain, iommu, bus,
> > devfn);
> > +	if (!info) {
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +	}
> > +	did = dmar_domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id];
> > +	sid = PCI_DEVID(bus, devfn);
> > +	size = to_vtd_size(inv_info->addr_info.granule_size,
> > inv_info->addr_info.nb_granules); +
> > +	for_each_set_bit(cache_type, (unsigned long
> > *)&inv_info->cache, IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR) {
> > +		u64 granu = 0;
> > +		u64 pasid = 0;
> > +
> > +		ret = to_vtd_granularity(cache_type,
> > inv_info->granularity, &granu);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			pr_err("Invalid cache type and granu
> > combination %d/%d\n", cache_type,
> > +				inv_info->granularity);
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* PASID is stored in different locations based on
> > granularity */
> > +		if (inv_info->granularity == IOMMU_INV_GRANU_PASID)
> > +			pasid = inv_info->pasid_info.pasid;  
> you need to check IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_PASID in flags
You mean to check IOMMU_INV_PASID_FLAGS_PASID?
You are right we need to check this flag to make sure the PASID value
is valid. i.e.

if (inv_info->granularity == IOMMU_INV_GRANU_PASID &&
	inv_info->pasid_info.flags & IOMMU_INV_PASID_FLAGS_PASID)
	pasid = inv_info->pasid_info.pasid;


> > +		else if (inv_info->granularity ==
> > IOMMU_INV_GRANU_ADDR)
> > +			pasid = inv_info->addr_info.pasid;  
> same
Ditto.
else if (inv_info->granularity == IOMMU_INV_GRANU_ADDR &&
	inv_info->addr_info.flags & IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_PASID)
	pasid = inv_info->addr_info.pasid;

> > +		else {
> > +			pr_err("Cannot find PASID for given cache
> > type and granularity\n");
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		switch (BIT(cache_type)) {
> > +		case IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB:
> > +			if (size && (inv_info->addr_info.addr &
> > ((BIT(VTD_PAGE_SHIFT + size)) - 1))) {
> > +				pr_err("Address out of range,
> > 0x%llx, size order %llu\n",  
> don't you mean address not correctly aligned?
> > +					inv_info->addr_info.addr,
> > size);
> > +				ret = -ERANGE;
> > +				goto out_unlock;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			qi_flush_piotlb(iommu, did,
> > mm_to_dma_pfn(inv_info->addr_info.addr),
> > +					pasid, size, granu,
> > inv_info->addr_info.flags & IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_LEAF); +
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Always flush device IOTLB if ATS is
> > enabled since guest
> > +			 * vIOMMU exposes CM = 1, no device IOTLB
> > flush will be passed
> > +			 * down.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (info->ats_enabled) {
> > +				qi_flush_dev_piotlb(iommu, sid,
> > info->pfsid,
> > +						pasid,
> > info->ats_qdep,
> > +
> > inv_info->addr_info.addr, size,
> > +						granu);
> > +			}
> > +			break;
> > +		case IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_DEV_IOTLB:
> > +			if (info->ats_enabled) {
> > +				qi_flush_dev_piotlb(iommu, sid,
> > info->pfsid,
> > +
> > inv_info->addr_info.pasid, info->ats_qdep,
> > +
> > inv_info->addr_info.addr, size,
> > +						granu);
> > +			} else
> > +				pr_warn("Passdown device IOTLB
> > flush w/o ATS!\n"); +
> > +			break;
> > +		case IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_PASID:
> > +			qi_flush_pasid_cache(iommu, did, granu,
> > inv_info->pasid_info.pasid); +
> > +			break;
> > +		default:
> > +			dev_err(dev, "Unsupported IOMMU
> > invalidation type %d\n",
> > +				cache_type);
> > +			ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +out_unlock:
> > +	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  static int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> >  			   unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t hpa,
> >  			   size_t size, int iommu_prot)
> > @@ -6027,6 +6196,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
> >  	.is_attach_deferred	=
> > intel_iommu_is_attach_deferred, .pgsize_bitmap		=
> > INTEL_IOMMU_PGSIZES, #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > +	.cache_invalidate	= intel_iommu_sva_invalidate,
> >  	.sva_bind_gpasid	= intel_svm_bind_gpasid,
> >  	.sva_unbind_gpasid	= intel_svm_unbind_gpasid,
> >  #endif
> >   
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> 
Thanks,

Jacob