Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2698362ybv; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:26:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJWWUUf8VYMtuZa+ApsPH23L7lstaBTmsdo+5w/nrP0ugAYqubO/79PIymRSjFbZng7Bqm X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6446:: with SMTP id m6mr5243373otl.122.1581758814325; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:26:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581758814; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VA+T2IHJnjYJ1TmIIzO2PKe6lGvea1DBoZyzHJ23Gf2rnMggXUmfLl/qAXhZg1SEkX z3A+eU4/jX/1tp1D2a6ACwe+Rp4oiNezEHmJdYnmxfOs1bnbVBH/kiPFl7AEgHqblF77 ngzSaiZESOtNVNAbR5Y4ZDa15rzB7ew+U+ih5q8GPCOqjQUjYzlCWEgJNnZQ7o+ijYi/ XcC4Ic9uC6Zej+aza2KKV1mFhSIz/c64xbbHP9Tgj1RDl2A/JQJMvIzKD8v1ix2arPJy lq4LAYHgr1jA8TzB0wX9zWvJ2jXzQvIP0efdPwWGpDxJk7fCxc+8s6AyDDMN+bS1+uim 21kA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=gYIVzW35lCEUKrzme1cfh9PKxmbJSkK4PmawjzRR5ko=; b=VL6fAodBG9QxE/g1/l3NY/2NwrZAzuNdguBBOfG6u5RTDXaiqcF+ZYybO13lfjirq3 vrjZrWzRMz7Tv/g61AKbLltGfzSu4LYY7lkllwdRUbTYFTXNnrYDdUimhF0jz+jl3mtI rlHZ/J7gExTs60YB7OzQ+LB3cMbMIdYjapnCDr1rOPXClmv6ziMlagd9u3+B6Duv9CL5 seVshPG//2YB2ZrbYPtDB4RdK/j60cBmcoqFvagxeOfwNQHsAcYVz/rqUCNZ9yPRSQv9 F+fqxetgUoLJYlTpq+fEu7ujaivYlnPB3FHYuN7z0tItIMIzojmOVGR8TeuVdpTvO/ck ep4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d23si4119219oij.270.2020.02.15.01.26.40; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:26:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726129AbgBOJZM (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 04:25:12 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:56927 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725852AbgBOJZL (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 04:25:11 -0500 Received: from p5b06da22.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.34] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1j2th4-0005vn-Gk; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:24:58 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6270F101161; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:24:57 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Sean V Kelley , bhelgaas@google.com, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kar.hin.ong@ni.com, sassmann@kpanic.de, Sean V Kelley Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add boot interrupt quirk mechanism for Xeon chipsets In-Reply-To: <20200214213313.66622-1-sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com> References: <20200214213313.66622-1-sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:24:57 +0100 Message-ID: <8736bctd7a.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sean V Kelley writes: > When IRQ lines on secondary or higher IO-APICs are masked (e.g., > Real-Time threaded interrupts), many chipsets redirect IRQs on > this line to the legacy PCH and in turn the base IO-APIC in the > system. The unhandled interrupts on the base IO-APIC will be > identified by the Linux kernel as Spurious Interrupts and can > lead to disabled IRQ lines. > > Disabling this legacy PCI interrupt routing is chipset-specific and > varies in mechanism between chipset vendors and across generations. > In some cases the mechanism is exposed to BIOS but not all BIOS > vendors choose to pick it up. With the increasing usage of RT as it > marches towards mainline, additional issues have been raised with > more recent Xeon chipsets. > > This patchset disables the boot interrupt on these Xeon chipsets where > this is possible with an additional mechanism. In addition, this > patchset includes documentation covering the background of this quirk. Well done! The documentation is really appreciated! Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner