Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750922AbWBHUu4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:50:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750939AbWBHUu4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:50:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:45244 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750875AbWBHUuz (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:50:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:50:33 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: Bernd Schubert Cc: John M Flinchbaugh , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Sam Vilain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Message-ID: <20060208205033.GB22771@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <200602080212.27896.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> <43E94A02.2080205@vilain.net> <20060208053732.GA13560@butterfly.hjsoft.com> <200602081314.59639.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602081314.59639.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1478 Lines: 47 * Bernd Schubert (bernd-schubert@gmx.de) wrote: > On Wednesday 08 February 2006 06:37, John M Flinchbaugh wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:31:46PM +1300, Sam Vilain wrote: > > > Bernd Schubert wrote: > > > >With 2.6.15: > > > >bathl:~# touch /var/run/test > > > >touch: cannot touch `/var/run/test': Permission denied > > > >With 2.6.13: > > > >bathl:~# touch /var/run/test > > > >(No error message) > > > > > > Some ideas; ACLs, SELinux, Attributes, Capabilities. > > > > lsattr -d /var/run && lsattr /var/run > > Indeed, with 2.6.13 > > bathl:~# lsattr -d /var/run > lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags on /var/run > > with 2.6.15.3 OK, this has a reiserfs fix for attrs support. Rather than back it out, I'd like to get the proper fix. > bathl:~# cat lsatr.out.2.6.15 > --S-ia-AcBZXEj-t- /var/run > > After the problem came up, I already suspected something like this and > therefore already had the kernel recompiled without xattr support, so I > don't know why lsattr shows something for 2.6.15 and nothing for 2.6.13. attrs != xattrs Couple of things: 1) what does 'grep attrs_cleared /proc/fs/reiserfs/on-disk-super' show? 2) does mount -o attrs ... make a difference? thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/