Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/cputable: Remove unnecessary copy of
 cpu_spec->oprofile_type
To:     Leonardo Bras <leonardo@linux.ibm.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, desnesn@linux.ibm.com
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200215053637.280880-1-leonardo@linux.ibm.com>
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Message-ID: <0d33a8b2-a7e5-c3e0-b28a-fd39f1231d97@c-s.fr>
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:31:14 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200215053637.280880-1-leonardo@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


Le 15/02/2020 à 06:36, Leonardo Bras a écrit :
> Before checking for cpu_type == NULL, this same copy happens, so doing
> it here will just write the same value to the t->oprofile_type
> again.
> 
> Remove the repeated copy, as it is unnecessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> index e745abc5457a..5a87ec96582f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> @@ -2197,7 +2197,6 @@ static struct cpu_spec * __init setup_cpu_spec(unsigned long offset,
>   		 */
>   		if (old.oprofile_cpu_type != NULL) {
>   			t->oprofile_cpu_type = old.oprofile_cpu_type;
> -			t->oprofile_type = old.oprofile_type;
>   		}

The action being reduced to a single line, the { } should be removed.

Christophe