Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4882647ybv; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:44:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfaYlByMDhD4JtuLuVD4VlW14wEJ7X9SaFF10eeA20u4dcKLx7DYzWhwNEUE1wEIWoy3Ti X-Received: by 2002:aca:f587:: with SMTP id t129mr10032597oih.143.1581954277831; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:44:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581954277; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IG3IG0z1BsyQimufz/DujzcpLpiPooVhn6C1ejNl8FgvyGrCWnzO4LQW/v9jscOnHO Lz6Pupawuh4RtcVlLMBjZmbsAiV2G+pYAyJ4sQcC4AVkwxFKT7+ei5UZTC5HKbKbPhUe uz2/mC5x6B+NvYqlL1pdCzi4PRUFs6z5IgA0rgDlLYi2KhNcrE+iKyC06fFWbSGYUIFI aq9VnS9/W3s+ixxArDuPl6hDn4scXnZOioPaOVatjb5dolEWq7p9RkStxSPXWjkYiE0K UbeD93VBCZOyBVFdyWtz9yQEYnvva5XABZnCRCZbuRRHg2NwIBwP9Ka25q1wzSq5ybcK Q/0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=3O8jFKmrK2p/IgaZ8eZ/DmHpOl6oK1NgLRGZMai/GU0=; b=HYz6gWKSR3Kqo3TT0/FXjFsB3YJY29QZzu8vpgWTPSbWGoaQAO9JA1LBhSU7dUnszM 6tK5qPZPFLI9HQ8SihGQY0M0wzVngEPp1wXFZrdaRID6GA5YAvtdCYbRRmcfq1xlApY3 XKdW+wTSyx+bSzc+UDfumV8l2cjdrBj/+mhlCEZ4TOJO0hIBhdzsq6hwHKMfL53O2ns+ rwUsMsdNlILDq+edMUgqgvkygvCOYhWI+1c6WlWkLKaH6bwq8uYdXO5mgUMVocOmUKO5 7bTskGejEDj3Kg44hN+IEKW/WrxksTkdnp48wyrf2UXCLYSTxx6S3bF8waQ2sIKxqNEx k7AQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w202si7098241oif.121.2020.02.17.07.44.24; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:44:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729319AbgBQPnD (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:43:03 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:37644 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728000AbgBQPnD (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:43:03 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F72C30E; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:43:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 982983F703; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:43:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:43:01 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Stephan Gerhold Cc: Sameer Pujar , tiwai@suse.com, perex@perex.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai Message-ID: <20200217154301.GN9304@sirena.org.uk> References: <1579443563-12287-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com> <20200217144120.GA243254@gerhold.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b1ERR0FXR0PvNIRE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200217144120.GA243254@gerhold.net> X-Cookie: There was a phone call for you. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --b1ERR0FXR0PvNIRE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:41:20PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK > used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case? It is in the normal case, but with a CODEC<->CODEC link (which was what this was targeting) we need to bodge things by swapping playback and capture on one end of the link. --b1ERR0FXR0PvNIRE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl5KtIQACgkQJNaLcl1U h9ARMgf+NQDaYx839skXXMcRLyATLepufKGk9l1m2+rsQ1ajEhuvgD8/e4YhVxcE kbFp40QlkXHOJVhDmDdTzdGQAVw4bZUk4++qr0sv9wbyPE/vnN1eL1g86TN2jYYR p6N2CzZLf6bqK10PNGgBxKu7ybsFm745FxIhEcPkYEAKUF3H9PANqu8hLvwmTNdW YRUBomA6kOqU+odw/XwK8ztCS5cruwTjaAHZP6QsiHuGWFovmomqXJRNZhcpWXRU HJnA40MLOI6wqd1eKDL+sZsIh26xr5hapqLdLYBwvXCh8gzup+ECt59LHEm/7hdQ OePPOr10MHw9LA7a4ByEiuvTidCFUw== =44+D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b1ERR0FXR0PvNIRE--