Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5020827ybv; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:32:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwj08VyyrQFqfFFavoFLDhj10/b/vieTtDzj4SCjUI2I0/ryAnwh0ckONPLHSh1CjiYAY8H X-Received: by 2002:aca:8d5:: with SMTP id 204mr192760oii.141.1581964376237; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:32:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581964376; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L8j8MMKUZOICBW/tIWZrHiK10FLHVHQFdvvtFoV1QHoPDSN2TK/Vc2i+KmqEI3p2d0 3pZNLU/ZVXvBp6DR8SDmEioANvyqkyeRqSMHV+CwKaXz3vUP5baibXBsGhue/rp0wMid jXM41mIUhQYpMH846lZuvkdWGkaMtuVYr2tgBikx/BUyq16JUCKr3t+XqPJXW0IismA2 DB4mwgV/PjJvmH+xoO6wVcWgZLKsT3Mzoty7uEE4CsO+LKumV8tQjqZGVm4xyJMUdBZb /xUiKvMUKjKQVl4dNxBhjE1YdZpp0PMHo9bhePUBQhY4j9MAjAAa4O/5QkK9ezWLAzxR iH0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=D+1yn/+FlUeRCugN19T//iJGZZ+oHf8mUGQV6KCizdI=; b=iGUMB7w3hkoLe1OMtD9ifLByiOOgUmgAl6sIv6hWm4WOvXuoiB/MOIbRp3m5OfRGHR ENL8NESDHdZGi9YzXkkXQg9YxpYFhmChttzibeu5Dh3IA6p3zGHKGvEwqBs52h0H0P0Q kmYY4FynnsCR5tFqNFIcvmrDcJ98ZG3qkk7Fy9AVcj1+5Tv3ITq5vAF98i09YA/t4phq mXzz0f2SfbuLOTzHgFe7e1A+/eOAxBtMVSI86bFXMPeB1MiJIPqTeAZl/CbWrUUw7X6f cxysEd5ytdy6457EwtVTKRFeGHFeiaUNrvJS+qKm1Sii3MvcbZ1PJMacgdtXrV01j+GZ MAFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l21si7100821oic.126.2020.02.17.10.32.43; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:32:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729021AbgBQS3M (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:29:12 -0500 Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138]:56104 "EHLO cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727749AbgBQS3L (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:29:11 -0500 Received: (from localhost user: 'ladis' uid#1021 fake: STDIN (ladis@eddie.linux-mips.org)) by eddie.linux-mips.org id S23990923AbgBQS3JEK45R (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:29:09 +0100 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:29:06 +0100 From: Ladislav Michl To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" Cc: MyungJoo Ham , Chanwoo Choi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org, kernel@pyra-handheld.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] extcon: palmas: hide error messages if gpio returns -EPROBE_DEFER Message-ID: <20200217182906.GA140676@lenoch> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 02:58:14PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > > > Am 17.02.2020 um 14:38 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > > > If the gpios are probed after this driver (e.g. if they > > come from an i2c expander) there is no need to print an > > error message. > > > > Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller > > --- > > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c | 8 ++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c > > index edc5016f46f1..cea58d0cb457 100644 > > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c > > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c > > @@ -205,14 +205,18 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > palmas_usb->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "id", > > GPIOD_IN); > > - if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) { > > + if (PTR_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod) == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + } else if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) { > > Hm. > > While looking again at that: why do we need the "{" and "} else "? > > It should be sufficient to have > > > palmas_usb->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "id", > > GPIOD_IN); > > + if (PTR_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) { > > What do you think is better coding style here? How about something like this? (just an idea with some work left for you ;-)) --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c @@ -206,8 +206,10 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) palmas_usb->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "id", GPIOD_IN); if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get id gpio\n"); - return PTR_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod); + status = PTR_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod); + if (status != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get id gpio: %d\n", status); + return status; } palmas_usb->vbus_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "vbus",