Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422651AbWBIKx3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 05:53:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422881AbWBIKx3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 05:53:29 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.21]:63667 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1422651AbWBIKx2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 05:53:28 -0500 X-Authenticated: #428038 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:53:24 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: Joerg Schilling Cc: peter.read@gmail.com, matthias.andree@gmx.de, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <20060209105324.GC15173@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Schilling , peter.read@gmail.com, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net References: <43E7545E.nail7GN11WAQ9@burner> <73d8d0290602060706o75f04c1cx@mail.gmail.com> <43E7680E.2000506@gmx.de> <20060206205437.GA12270@voodoo> <43E89B56.nailA792EWNLG@burner> <20060207183712.GC5341@voodoo> <43E9F1CD.nail2BR11FL52@burner> <20060208210219.GB9166@DervishD> <20060208211455.GC2480@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <43EB1988.nail7EL2I7AN6@burner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43EB1988.nail7EL2I7AN6@burner> X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1180 Lines: 26 Joerg Schilling schrieb am 2006-02-09: > lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: > > > Hmm, perhaps what should be done is that someone needs to write and > > maintain a patch that linux users can apply to cdrecord (since other OSs > > are different and hence have no reason to use such a patch), to make it > > behave in a manner which is sane on linux. It should of course be > > clearly marked as having been changed in such a way. It should use udev > > if available and HAL and whatever else is appropriate on a modern linux > > system, and if on an old system it should at least not break the > > interfaces that already worked on those systems in cdrecord. > > Unfortunately is it a matter oif facts that all known patches for cdrecord > break more things than they claim to fix. So prove my patch is wrong, and give a detailed report what it breaks, unless you wish to fix it yourself. -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/