Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5692604ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:10:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxYKa+ytp+TT9laWxmvrf3xeyvcPjDYwFSlR8vKNSEjFjBmbuMbCFGsoI0sDokTW8foiTc7 X-Received: by 2002:aca:a857:: with SMTP id r84mr699482oie.41.1582020625989; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:10:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582020625; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GOCxNgWlV+sKuznXmPTQvOCChYq6rlmtI/g0N0NMQyNQRwiw3huU61NOkqfyTnbSFe UVUHlOPsFhkudH3MVhb6ZhtF51YKIm6ZCnfIyKFZx2ny/ICW5wAQsiuHO7j3XOgDmm5C kLBoAlE7D4nTQk/3wC7LVlY+SdbLBOGIq3paHHNu7ndm4UMfJfc/E7pX0mMSpvMrPSbo 2dDvI9LpHQC5vLLJNP7RoeczblFpIJ/bpia2ULx0V06tUTOOmlhcw7A8OEmoWdVcPWqg 4FD8CSCvsOw/sST+u4RVPF+bQpO7CNZ50+zPj6GzQJmnBlWdpqh7x3Q4+upo1Wto+vad hdpw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:thread-index:thread-topic :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:references :in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date; bh=9OazpecV3UHVYYK5ENJMdZlyuzV5QXTz89H1cOEBsvY=; b=hh9QHei3qEmmItTPZJY3Ua/PQYeufkaiLCT+3AHGC9AXRohJBcYrx2XpVkv4/KPia7 j0+m7Lp+YprVnj5A/d+CK/8H4ZwcCDlzDk+kUuxwrjTItvKvummUtr2DfDUueUX9kfUN f4hnJKV/H+/mNaMiw16Ig8ZT8gkznOtOSQZOh2hpQ9VdDPIOpLMGp5eUNyPTps7FRu6N scCWmWNE6MVcBvhYrqSITedOV+DbG69hcwFbhosMprEBDrN/ANPGHo8jX2NgDtSp7LNS Whs7gFqgOVvZKkSPHEkn3KAHKaheoxgJcAHv5hGal7cvxRjUs2Vx5eviYMWFIGy/Wdk0 OPgQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p189si263218oic.134.2020.02.18.02.10.12; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 02:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726445AbgBRKKI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:10:08 -0500 Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu ([92.103.151.219]:32990 "EHLO zimbra2.kalray.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726193AbgBRKKI (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:10:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra2.kalray.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F4927E1650; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:10:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra2.kalray.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id aBAB94zh_Hyx; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:10:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra2.kalray.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B7E27E058F; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:10:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra2.kalray.eu Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra2.kalray.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id R7WFYViiMMDj; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:10:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra2.kalray.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F1A27E1650; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:10:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:10:04 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Leger To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Arnaud Pouliquen , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Jonathan Corbet , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , linux-remoteproc , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Andy Gross , Patrice Chotard , linux-doc , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel , linux-arm-msm , Loic PALLARDY , s-anna Message-ID: <838984434.4934674.1582020604015.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> In-Reply-To: References: <527785289.2852303.1581062223707.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <20200210162209.23149-1-cleger@kalray.eu> <20200210162209.23149-2-cleger@kalray.eu> <4465bade-e3de-88b8-63a5-e5410de9adc0@st.com> <884697376.3644142.1581439161953.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <20200211223715.GA27770@xps15> <296765414.3763778.1581503820255.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Originating-IP: [192.168.40.202] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_3895 (ZimbraWebClient - GC75 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_3895) Thread-Topic: remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va Thread-Index: Qhvxe95iDK5EsIjlyXH8etHXh1QScg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mathieu, ----- On 12 Feb, 2020, at 22:59, Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 03:37, Clément Leger wrote: >> >> Hi Mathieu, >> >> ----- On 11 Feb, 2020, at 23:37, Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Clément Leger wrote: >> >> Hi Arnaud, >> >> >> >> ----- On 11 Feb, 2020, at 16:53, Arnaud Pouliquen arnaud.pouliquen@st.com wrote: >> >> >> >> > On 2/10/20 5:22 PM, Clement Leger wrote: >> >> >> With upcoming changes in elf loader for elf64 support, section size will >> >> >> be a u64. When used with da_to_va, this will potentially lead to >> >> >> overflow if using the current "int" type for len argument. Change >> >> >> da_to_va prototype to use a u64 for len and fix all users of this >> >> >> function. >> >> >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger >> >> >> --- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 11 ++++++----- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c | 4 ++-- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 2 +- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 2 +- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 2 +- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 2 +- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 +- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 4 ++-- >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c | 4 ++-- >> >> >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 +- >> >> >> 12 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c >> >> >> index 3e72b6f38d4b..f497f5b49b18 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c >> >> >> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> static int imx_rproc_da_to_sys(struct imx_rproc *priv, u64 da, >> >> >> - int len, u64 *sys) >> >> >> + u64 len, u64 *sys) >> >> >> { >> >> >> const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg; >> >> >> int i; >> >> >> @@ -203,19 +203,19 @@ static int imx_rproc_da_to_sys(struct imx_rproc *priv, u64 >> >> >> da, >> >> >> } >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> - dev_warn(priv->dev, "Translation failed: da = 0x%llx len = 0x%x\n", >> >> >> + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Translation failed: da = 0x%llx len = 0x%llx\n", >> >> >> da, len); >> >> >> return -ENOENT; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv; >> >> >> void *va = NULL; >> >> >> u64 sys; >> >> >> int i; >> >> >> >> >> >> - if (len <= 0) >> >> >> + if (len == 0) >> >> >> return NULL; >> >> >> >> >> >> /* >> >> >> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, >> >> >> int len) >> >> >> } >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> - dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da = 0x%llx len = 0x%x va = 0x%p\n", da, len, va); >> >> >> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da = 0x%llx len = 0x%llx va = 0x%p\n", >> >> >> + da, len, va); >> >> >> >> >> >> return va; >> >> >> } >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c >> >> >> index 5c4658f00b3d..466093f48814 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c >> >> >> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void keystone_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int >> >> >> vqid) >> >> >> * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel >> >> >> * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers. >> >> >> */ >> >> >> -static void *keystone_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *keystone_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct keystone_rproc *ksproc = rproc->priv; >> >> >> void __iomem *va = NULL; >> >> >> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static void *keystone_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, >> >> >> u64 da, int len) >> >> >> size_t size; >> >> >> int i; >> >> >> >> >> >> - if (len <= 0) >> >> >> + if (len == 0) >> >> >> return NULL; >> >> >> >> >> >> for (i = 0; i < ksproc->num_mems; i++) { >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c >> >> >> index e953886b2eb7..7518e67a49e5 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c >> >> >> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> >> return ret; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct qcom_adsp *adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv; >> >> >> int offset; >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c >> >> >> index 471128a2e723..248febde6fc1 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c >> >> >> @@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ static int q6v5_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> >> return 0; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -static void *q6v5_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *q6v5_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct q6v5 *qproc = rproc->priv; >> >> >> int offset; >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c >> >> >> index db4b3c4bacd7..cf2cd609c90d 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c >> >> >> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> >> return ret; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct qcom_adsp *adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv; >> >> >> int offset; >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c >> >> >> index f93e1e4a1cc0..3a6b82a16961 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c >> >> >> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int q6v5_wcss_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> >> return 0; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -static void *q6v5_wcss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *q6v5_wcss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct q6v5_wcss *wcss = rproc->priv; >> >> >> int offset; >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c >> >> >> index dc135754bb9c..f893219e45a8 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c >> >> >> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int wcnss_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> >> return ret; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -static void *wcnss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *wcnss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct qcom_wcnss *wcnss = (struct qcom_wcnss *)rproc->priv; >> >> >> int offset; >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> >> >> index 307df98347ba..9e6d3c6a60ee 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> >> >> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa); >> >> >> * here the output of the DMA API for the carveouts, which should be more >> >> >> * correct. >> >> >> */ >> >> >> -void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> > >> >> > This function is exported, don't see any update in consequence... >> >> > references: >> >> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6-rc1/ident/rproc_da_to_va >> >> > For instance the function rproc_trace_read use it. it quite strange that my gcc >> >> > does not warns for the cast but i suppose that some could. >> >> >> >> Agreed, even if len should never have been a signed type since it can't be >> >> negative. I will try to fix all callers. >> >> >> >> > An indirect consequence is that the len field in rproc_mem_entry struct should >> >> > probably been updated to u64 to be aligned. >> >> >> >> Ok, I will do that once we settle on the type of len. >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I'm still wondering about the use of size_t instead,which seems more rational >> >> > from my window. >> >> > So i you or Mathieu remember it was decided to use u64, please could remind me >> >> > the arguments? >> >> >> >> I tried to find the notes of a meeting we had for OpenAMP but I did not found >> >> them. Anyway, the argument was coming from Tomas or someone else, (I can't >> >> remember) talking about a 32 bits CPU executing code on a 64 bits accelerator. >> >> In that case, the size_t type could fail due to being only 32bits on the host >> >> CPU but larger than 4G. >> >> >> >> However, I can't say if it's a real usecase or not... All I can say is >> >> that keeping it open is probably better if one day somebody comes with such >> >> architecture. >> > >> > In order to support a 32bit AP with a 64bit MCU we'd also have to deal with all >> > the dma_attr_t in the structure we use. >> >> Totally ok with that... >> >> > >> > Also something that became very clear to me while thinking about this patchset >> > is that supporting elf64 does __not__ mean we support 64bit MCU. As long as >> > the addresses conveyed by the elf64 image fit within 32 bits we are fine. >> > Supporting 64bit MCUs is a completely different topic, one that will demand >> > serious refactoring. >> >> Exactly, an elf64 can potentially contain an executable fitting in 32 bits. >> >> > >> > So moving from "int len" to "u64 len" doesn't give us much. It doesn't hurt to >> > do it but if @len ever becomes bigger than 31 bits we'll have other problems to >> > deal with. >> >> Agreed, so what would be your recommendation reagrding the type of len ? >> I'm ok with Arnaud statement too and using a size_t is probably more >> "type-safe" than a u64. At least it adds some information. > > If @len becomes big enough that it doesn't fit in 31bit then it is > very likely that things will break even before we get to call > rproc_da_to_va(). Fixing it here is possible but will introduce a > fair amount of ripple effect that we probably don't want to deal with > right now. I did the modification using u64 and tried to follow various code path. Some end up in dma_alloc_coherent which uses a size_t member. Since these might be called by rproc with a u64 len, I would be more inclined to use a size_t. I can probably also add a check in elf loader which verifies that if sizeof(size_t) < sizeof(u64), then the len must fit in 32bits. This seems more clean IMHO. Clément. > > Other people might feel more opinionated on this but as far as I'm > concerned, I would keep it as it is and fix it for real when the time > comes to add support for 64bit MCUs. > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Clément >> >> > >> >> >> >> > As an alternative a check should be added for 32 bits processors to ensure that >> >> > the size is not higher than >> >> > its address range capability... >> >> >> >> Agreed. >> >> I was even thinking about a mecanism for remoteproc drivers to declare the type >> >> of supported elfs files (such as EM_*, ELFCLASS* and other needed thing). >> >> Or should it be supported by overriding .sanity_check in drivers to reject >> >> elf64 for instance ? >> >> >> >> Since elf is a "specific format" and that rproc can support other formats, >> >> I did not want to add a specific elf_sanity_check field to rproc ops. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Clément >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Regards >> >> > Arnaud >> >> > >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout; >> >> >> void *ptr = NULL; >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> >> >> index 493ef9262411..004867061721 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> >> >> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void rproc_exit_sysfs(void); >> >> >> void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring); >> >> >> int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i); >> >> >> >> >> >> -void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len); >> >> >> +void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len); >> >> >> phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr); >> >> >> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc); >> >> >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c >> >> >> index 04492fead3c8..fc01cd879b60 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c >> >> >> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int slim_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> >> return 0; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc = rproc->priv; >> >> >> void *va = NULL; >> >> >> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 >> >> >> da, int len) >> >> >> } >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> - dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da = 0x%llx len = 0x%x va = 0x%pK\n", >> >> >> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da = 0x%llx len = 0x%llx va = 0x%pK\n", >> >> >> da, len, va); >> >> >> >> >> >> return va; >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c >> >> >> index 3984e585c847..91485b467407 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c >> >> >> @@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ static int wkup_m3_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> >> >> return 0; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -static void *wkup_m3_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> >> >> +static void *wkup_m3_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) >> >> >> { >> >> >> struct wkup_m3_rproc *wkupm3 = rproc->priv; >> >> >> void *va = NULL; >> >> >> int i; >> >> >> u32 offset; >> >> >> >> >> >> - if (len <= 0) >> >> >> + if (len == 0) >> >> >> return NULL; >> >> >> >> >> >> for (i = 0; i < WKUPM3_MEM_MAX; i++) { >> >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> >> >> index 16ad66683ad0..f84bd5fe0211 100644 >> >> >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> >> >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> >> >> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ struct rproc_ops { >> >> >> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc); >> >> >> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc); >> >> >> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid); >> >> >> - void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len); >> >> >> + void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len); >> >> >> int (*parse_fw)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); >> >> >> int (*handle_rsc)(struct rproc *rproc, u32 rsc_type, void *rsc, > > > > >> int offset, int avail);