Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] leds: add support for apa102c leds
To:     Nicolas Belin <nbelin@baylibre.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
        <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>, <pavel@ucw.cz>
References: <1582018657-5720-1-git-send-email-nbelin@baylibre.com>
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Message-ID: <04642127-0e68-43b1-9b6c-0dbb56dc9bfe@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:43:12 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1582018657-5720-1-git-send-email-nbelin@baylibre.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hellp

On 2/18/20 3:37 AM, Nicolas Belin wrote:
> This patch series adds the driver and its related documentation
> for the APA102C RGB Leds.
>
> Patch 1 adds the APA102C led manufacturer to the vendor-prefixes list.
>
> Patch 2 Documents the APA102C led driver.
>
> Patch 3 contains the actual driver code and modifications in the Kconfig
> and the Makefile.

Is this something that can benefit from the Multicolor framework patches?

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=427513

Can you RFC the APA102C driver on top of the Multicolor FW to see how it 
blends?

Dan