Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp6056789ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:03:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy+315iYcLTP/oyd00q5j0KHXxfPLaYZ1SmZ9zr26cUY4nrHUjl6TdPJT6DRMBIBG15CImo X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6ac2:: with SMTP id m2mr16712366otq.191.1582045423333; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:03:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582045423; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ar1ThrRdJUxZdCDjMbebE4rwixdeDC4G2QPBcQ1him+tfL0S72b1oX/HQDsYWbEfka nP3xcgv9eDDUGyjhF6MgzXucjGndRT1tpnMhQzDBCQ3CIcle4//fGV5XzqgUKyMTJVJb XIpWWCSMadzBgMyxjlNvvZ7+fA8GIrtPqHiEnYEA5QLB8uFRe1aRrjE5hSsuXoFHuvPW Z/OgKdeCIqHbo4oZc1uVPPxYRDfabqgEEF8SJJWOkny0qwuoWH1AjRY/XSUHebT3IYdu 23SbG9UzVWNXUOni9QFD2onPcU3Y3L487d/x5oSBGKppgMQWjX/XFChm6CYq39qlZOFy WrgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=L7YKkStQy0HaUDpQ8otD8q6JN+bPGYhLImttcQHkX8Q=; b=NmhtgXA2W2nUFOxOEyoaEzAU3R0VYVafbIMvF1NAeFuSZdMiscwX9hWW1xBNDisO7R jHpXPoQ9ahbtU4/YvWWTg4vs9HbaImcCEVbegLJMvmdn2y3dIW6E9cUfB13mv1ron2IS UHnNVgd0FrZTPhCRLWxzaS1v6RYkMkCkksYVCSKLniW79FVnomjZNZVoWMVIazt1n5Ty Sm8T4AnN7bbp83RvR3wPlxnRGUudWNCpFEDyCeChuLueEe3XOjjY9dWC5F0QkwuAEF9Z RAhda4iz2g1oG40jbrpl3hN/ZrV2RaxlMiptKvjik51RxnSRXNeaO+b0xXtjQqqSoBKm OM5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=d4R98e0F; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z4si8592354oix.48.2020.02.18.09.03.23; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=d4R98e0F; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726551AbgBRRB5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:01:57 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-f195.google.com ([209.85.166.195]:33160 "EHLO mail-il1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726415AbgBRRB4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:01:56 -0500 Received: by mail-il1-f195.google.com with SMTP id s18so17932377iln.0 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:01:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L7YKkStQy0HaUDpQ8otD8q6JN+bPGYhLImttcQHkX8Q=; b=d4R98e0FbzzaHiYbVom63VEbEXnKqJt9F5o+wAvUXXXqobPuzNHsNygVS6CrJwebDT 6cUZwOg6tbAwf7f5FsZPy/GGkgwo7iImbBkJxTcZ6+WLeYDNeL7mkhtoDQObIwhPiJpo RPMdix/FsGNnIz29BhiK8dr7Tlw6sMZEgEp/vMB88VgpafClp1rxxVsQVnPHBCDvVpml 89XA3cTGSd+nCpm5rTEgCgSxrS1CWudCISBZgXPcsbG9Nd6rPMGTUlFTo3HOQVyXnpub Vzv3phq2P6SgXl0wxvJAywtSIAiUBTSYKhTM+JWJV8LMnV9i/4BMf1rQDiTm8ev4yrDl HNtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L7YKkStQy0HaUDpQ8otD8q6JN+bPGYhLImttcQHkX8Q=; b=AjGGxJk9kVXKCp0SaCLsUekLZQRgNG5PRieOik/xikLTeUzFNROc+eB2HnO4hbheKt QtOdgsaekqszf3ZyIPRYT5Epu5ItmcW8Rmam4Wz2Sm+B4AmSMQJ7905Gs1uwADf8X54E Eh8tBxQEabfRTsMD1AqVcBlu5GydtVJdw1qqCQ+W+mRV3LOeMFWcyu2KB4KZr2294eh5 Nq0MIrasA6DfZY+ZE/RQ3zpshYQrVJocqnWcVjSzFlV68c/mHOG9kiMWyoYRFtl084D6 yTGP7dfTR1osbD4RNPfbDWcxuUlKNn+dcFborEQDgS+m+R91Ky9RsRdjOI18ejPYS0jj Hebw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLVk2fi2xPQG5wgR3o1trWLa9xbc5Dz2oAN5FvfR+laZrk2fd/ s1KfKFPGb8vsOXKf2a76aZc16CYTXDa7rM+gUuykhw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:8309:: with SMTP id f9mr11117890ild.50.1582045314347; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:01:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <527785289.2852303.1581062223707.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <20200210162209.23149-1-cleger@kalray.eu> <20200210162209.23149-2-cleger@kalray.eu> <4465bade-e3de-88b8-63a5-e5410de9adc0@st.com> <884697376.3644142.1581439161953.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <20200211223715.GA27770@xps15> <296765414.3763778.1581503820255.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <838984434.4934674.1582020604015.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> In-Reply-To: <838984434.4934674.1582020604015.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> From: Mathieu Poirier Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:01:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Leger?= Cc: Arnaud Pouliquen , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Jonathan Corbet , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , linux-remoteproc , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Andy Gross , Patrice Chotard , linux-doc , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel , linux-arm-msm , Loic PALLARDY , s-anna Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 03:10, Cl=C3=A9ment Leger wro= te: > > Hi Mathieu, > > ----- On 12 Feb, 2020, at 22:59, Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.o= rg wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 03:37, Cl=C3=A9ment Leger wro= te: > >> > >> Hi Mathieu, > >> > >> ----- On 11 Feb, 2020, at 23:37, Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linar= o.org > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Cl=C3=A9ment Leger wrote: > >> >> Hi Arnaud, > >> >> > >> >> ----- On 11 Feb, 2020, at 16:53, Arnaud Pouliquen arnaud.pouliquen@= st.com wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > On 2/10/20 5:22 PM, Clement Leger wrote: > >> >> >> With upcoming changes in elf loader for elf64 support, section s= ize will > >> >> >> be a u64. When used with da_to_va, this will potentially lead to > >> >> >> overflow if using the current "int" type for len argument. Chang= e > >> >> >> da_to_va prototype to use a u64 for len and fix all users of thi= s > >> >> >> function. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger > >> >> >> --- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 11 ++++++----- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c | 4 ++-- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 2 +- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 2 +- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 2 +- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 2 +- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 +- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 4 ++-- > >> >> >> drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c | 4 ++-- > >> >> >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 +- > >> >> >> 12 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc= /imx_rproc.c > >> >> >> index 3e72b6f38d4b..f497f5b49b18 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > >> >> >> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rpro= c) > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> static int imx_rproc_da_to_sys(struct imx_rproc *priv, u64 da, > >> >> >> - int len, u64 *sys) > >> >> >> + u64 len, u64 *sys) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg =3D priv->dcfg; > >> >> >> int i; > >> >> >> @@ -203,19 +203,19 @@ static int imx_rproc_da_to_sys(struct imx_= rproc *priv, u64 > >> >> >> da, > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - dev_warn(priv->dev, "Translation failed: da =3D 0x%llx len =3D= 0x%x\n", > >> >> >> + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Translation failed: da =3D 0x%llx len =3D= 0x%llx\n", > >> >> >> da, len); > >> >> >> return -ENOENT; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, in= t len) > >> >> >> +static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u6= 4 len) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct imx_rproc *priv =3D rproc->priv; > >> >> >> void *va =3D NULL; > >> >> >> u64 sys; > >> >> >> int i; > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - if (len <=3D 0) > >> >> >> + if (len =3D=3D 0) > >> >> >> return NULL; > >> >> >> > >> >> >> /* > >> >> >> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc= *rproc, u64 da, > >> >> >> int len) > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da =3D 0x%llx len =3D 0x%x va =3D 0x%p\n= ", da, len, va); > >> >> >> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da =3D 0x%llx len =3D 0x%llx va =3D 0x%p= \n", > >> >> >> + da, len, va); > >> >> >> > >> >> >> return va; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c > >> >> >> index 5c4658f00b3d..466093f48814 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c > >> >> >> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void keystone_rproc_kick(struct rproc= *rproc, int > >> >> >> vqid) > >> >> >> * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when = using kernel > >> >> >> * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers. > >> >> >> */ > >> >> >> -static void *keystone_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 d= a, int len) > >> >> >> +static void *keystone_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 d= a, u64 len) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct keystone_rproc *ksproc =3D rproc->priv; > >> >> >> void __iomem *va =3D NULL; > >> >> >> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static void *keystone_rproc_da_to_va(struct = rproc *rproc, > >> >> >> u64 da, int len) > >> >> >> size_t size; > >> >> >> int i; > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - if (len <=3D 0) > >> >> >> + if (len =3D=3D 0) > >> >> >> return NULL; > >> >> >> > >> >> >> for (i =3D 0; i < ksproc->num_mems; i++) { > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c > >> >> >> index e953886b2eb7..7518e67a49e5 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c > >> >> >> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > >> >> >> return ret; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len= ) > >> >> >> +static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len= ) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct qcom_adsp *adsp =3D (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv; > >> >> >> int offset; > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > >> >> >> index 471128a2e723..248febde6fc1 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > >> >> >> @@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ static int q6v5_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > >> >> >> return 0; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -static void *q6v5_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len= ) > >> >> >> +static void *q6v5_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len= ) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct q6v5 *qproc =3D rproc->priv; > >> >> >> int offset; > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > >> >> >> index db4b3c4bacd7..cf2cd609c90d 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > >> >> >> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > >> >> >> return ret; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len= ) > >> >> >> +static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len= ) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct qcom_adsp *adsp =3D (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv; > >> >> >> int offset; > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c > >> >> >> index f93e1e4a1cc0..3a6b82a16961 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c > >> >> >> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int q6v5_wcss_stop(struct rproc *rpro= c) > >> >> >> return 0; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -static void *q6v5_wcss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, in= t len) > >> >> >> +static void *q6v5_wcss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u6= 4 len) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct q6v5_wcss *wcss =3D rproc->priv; > >> >> >> int offset; > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remotepro= c/qcom_wcnss.c > >> >> >> index dc135754bb9c..f893219e45a8 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c > >> >> >> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int wcnss_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > >> >> >> return ret; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -static void *wcnss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int le= n) > >> >> >> +static void *wcnss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 le= n) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct qcom_wcnss *wcnss =3D (struct qcom_wcnss *)rproc->priv; > >> >> >> int offset; > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> >> >> index 307df98347ba..9e6d3c6a60ee 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> >> >> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa); > >> >> >> * here the output of the DMA API for the carveouts, which shou= ld be more > >> >> >> * correct. > >> >> >> */ > >> >> >> -void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) > >> >> >> +void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len) > >> >> > > >> >> > This function is exported, don't see any update in consequence... > >> >> > references: > >> >> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6-rc1/ident/rproc_da_to_va > >> >> > For instance the function rproc_trace_read use it. it quite stran= ge that my gcc > >> >> > does not warns for the cast but i suppose that some could. > >> >> > >> >> Agreed, even if len should never have been a signed type since it c= an't be > >> >> negative. I will try to fix all callers. > >> >> > >> >> > An indirect consequence is that the len field in rproc_mem_entry = struct should > >> >> > probably been updated to u64 to be aligned. > >> >> > >> >> Ok, I will do that once we settle on the type of len. > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm still wondering about the use of size_t instead,which seems m= ore rational > >> >> > from my window. > >> >> > So i you or Mathieu remember it was decided to use u64, please co= uld remind me > >> >> > the arguments? > >> >> > >> >> I tried to find the notes of a meeting we had for OpenAMP but I did= not found > >> >> them. Anyway, the argument was coming from Tomas or someone else, (= I can't > >> >> remember) talking about a 32 bits CPU executing code on a 64 bits a= ccelerator. > >> >> In that case, the size_t type could fail due to being only 32bits o= n the host > >> >> CPU but larger than 4G. > >> >> > >> >> However, I can't say if it's a real usecase or not... All I can say= is > >> >> that keeping it open is probably better if one day somebody comes w= ith such > >> >> architecture. > >> > > >> > In order to support a 32bit AP with a 64bit MCU we'd also have to de= al with all > >> > the dma_attr_t in the structure we use. > >> > >> Totally ok with that... > >> > >> > > >> > Also something that became very clear to me while thinking about thi= s patchset > >> > is that supporting elf64 does __not__ mean we support 64bit MCU. As= long as > >> > the addresses conveyed by the elf64 image fit within 32 bits we are = fine. > >> > Supporting 64bit MCUs is a completely different topic, one that will= demand > >> > serious refactoring. > >> > >> Exactly, an elf64 can potentially contain an executable fitting in 32 = bits. > >> > >> > > >> > So moving from "int len" to "u64 len" doesn't give us much. It does= n't hurt to > >> > do it but if @len ever becomes bigger than 31 bits we'll have other = problems to > >> > deal with. > >> > >> Agreed, so what would be your recommendation reagrding the type of len= ? > >> I'm ok with Arnaud statement too and using a size_t is probably more > >> "type-safe" than a u64. At least it adds some information. > > > > If @len becomes big enough that it doesn't fit in 31bit then it is > > very likely that things will break even before we get to call > > rproc_da_to_va(). Fixing it here is possible but will introduce a > > fair amount of ripple effect that we probably don't want to deal with > > right now. > > I did the modification using u64 and tried to follow various code path. > Some end up in dma_alloc_coherent which uses a size_t member. Since > these might be called by rproc with a u64 len, I would be more > inclined to use a size_t. I can probably also add a check in elf loader > which verifies that if sizeof(size_t) < sizeof(u64), then the len must > fit in 32bits. This seems more clean IMHO. > I'm all good with that. > Cl=C3=A9ment. > > > > > Other people might feel more opinionated on this but as far as I'm > > concerned, I would keep it as it is and fix it for real when the time > > comes to add support for 64bit MCUs. > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Cl=C3=A9ment > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > As an alternative a check should be added for 32 bits processors = to ensure that > >> >> > the size is not higher than > >> >> > its address range capability... > >> >> > >> >> Agreed. > >> >> I was even thinking about a mecanism for remoteproc drivers to decl= are the type > >> >> of supported elfs files (such as EM_*, ELFCLASS* and other needed t= hing). > >> >> Or should it be supported by overriding .sanity_check in drivers t= o reject > >> >> elf64 for instance ? > >> >> > >> >> Since elf is a "specific format" and that rproc can support other f= ormats, > >> >> I did not want to add a specific elf_sanity_check field to rproc op= s. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Cl=C3=A9ment > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Regards > >> >> > Arnaud > >> >> > > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout; > >> >> >> void *ptr =3D NULL; > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> >> >> index 493ef9262411..004867061721 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> >> >> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void rproc_exit_sysfs(void); > >> >> >> void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring); > >> >> >> int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i); > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len); > >> >> >> +void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len); > >> >> >> phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr); > >> >> >> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc); > >> >> >> > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> >> >> index 04492fead3c8..fc01cd879b60 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> >> >> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int slim_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rpr= oc) > >> >> >> return 0; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, i= nt len) > >> >> >> +static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u= 64 len) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc =3D rproc->priv; > >> >> >> void *va =3D NULL; > >> >> >> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rpro= c *rproc, u64 > >> >> >> da, int len) > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da =3D 0x%llx len =3D 0x%x va =3D 0x%pK\= n", > >> >> >> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da =3D 0x%llx len =3D 0x%llx va =3D 0x%p= K\n", > >> >> >> da, len, va); > >> >> >> > >> >> >> return va; > >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c > >> >> >> b/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c > >> >> >> index 3984e585c847..91485b467407 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c > >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c > >> >> >> @@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ static int wkup_m3_rproc_stop(struct rproc *= rproc) > >> >> >> return 0; > >> >> >> } > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -static void *wkup_m3_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da= , int len) > >> >> >> +static void *wkup_m3_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da= , u64 len) > >> >> >> { > >> >> >> struct wkup_m3_rproc *wkupm3 =3D rproc->priv; > >> >> >> void *va =3D NULL; > >> >> >> int i; > >> >> >> u32 offset; > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - if (len <=3D 0) > >> >> >> + if (len =3D=3D 0) > >> >> >> return NULL; > >> >> >> > >> >> >> for (i =3D 0; i < WKUPM3_MEM_MAX; i++) { > >> >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remotepr= oc.h > >> >> >> index 16ad66683ad0..f84bd5fe0211 100644 > >> >> >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > >> >> >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > >> >> >> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ struct rproc_ops { > >> >> >> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc); > >> >> >> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc); > >> >> >> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid); > >> >> >> - void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len); > >> >> >> + void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len); > >> >> >> int (*parse_fw)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw= ); > >> >> >> int (*handle_rsc)(struct rproc *rproc, u32 rsc_type, void *rsc= , > > > > > >> int offset, int avail);