Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp6101209ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:55:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzkPEX+bWFw6PMDDhGG2Ti7+6/woFZgKYgfT6N6Vt3kzTR4EHGjQc44lVC/pMqUt0QZ35qk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:aac:: with SMTP id r12mr2041475oij.59.1582048505641; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:55:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582048505; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Atofwf808AVHba+wavGKemtgk1vAlC9y+X66Yxw6SPMdPrlfe/9jkyzb9mcILLPckE pRPpF3GfnUoNInfyzLgS347OYsCm2zwAnKgLpfydimhqmN9W7AR/ELyEajZ5OzcOgFRU znPb/Drr7r4/zxA9dOhAK3XQmejoc4JnrP0OGvbO82l1+cCj7w9OTM6ZIsQIqEpj88iR Z76U+AYUm/VsnAKfQ1OjizVGbAoultbC35oPZzNh30W9QcEUQbqUBZpsWkJ14tgmZ1Er 3+PUVMmuqRLxymzoTjyQe8dOQZHeqC7zCtA8hL8GlugWrnzh1XjWUGH0wYCZqLiVmkTF 5KJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=xS1WMvG8bZHfZxTVyW6Tvr2CHUVaEzBLRa28+HqGUeQ=; b=LeUtsgMVrqGyh0K3cXYuXsH5s42YKUogiP2Ducw1VgzpsvhfKxE7L8f7Jh0D25LNeC GhzR/48egq//UtERKmTGrqvyHf6/NkNOD0jKDScUTbA6wQZkhddVhlXMl1nI3KlW2Q1X wcbza6vTNmEclvIX6nQ1cqmqLygFWUFYWksIgFnhT+Ux5bV3fOWVCTVQhAkFvk2Tsn1n YuytolhowwsCqE54zfPK1DNLbrZMdwX3HPekJMiLslIzs5nvONOEEZdLN0B8DEpSntXF Bs3At1mNGQ6D9q+TgCR9g6zKAfu3v0cnpniWKXaYpazJJkubqWNExsWeLONN7x4L0I0j oWaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f14si1888927oto.46.2020.02.18.09.54.53; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:55:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726707AbgBRRyo (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:54:44 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:57588 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726411AbgBRRyo (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:54:44 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B3031B; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:54:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.2.15] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9D683F68F; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:54:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/numa: Replace runnable_load_avg by load_avg To: Mel Gorman Cc: Vincent Guittot , mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pauld@redhat.com, parth@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com References: <20200214152729.6059-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20200214152729.6059-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20200218153801.GF3420@suse.de> <20200218174119.GG3420@suse.de> From: Valentin Schneider Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:54:29 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200218174119.GG3420@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/02/2020 17:41, Mel Gorman wrote: >>> I didn't merge that part of the first version of my series. I was >>> waiting to see how the implementation for allowing a small degree of >>> imbalance looks like. If it's entirely confined in adjust_numa_balance >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Apologies if that's a newbie question, but I'm not familiar with that one. >> Would that be added in your reconciliation series? I've only had a brief >> look at it yet (it's next on the chopping block). >> > > I should have wrote adjust_numa_imbalance but yes, it's part of the > reconciled series so that NUMA balancing and the load balancer use the > same helper. > Okay, thanks, then I guess I'll forget about any reconciliation for now and whinge about it when I'll get to your series ;)