Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1581949660-20113-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com> <1581949660-20113-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <1581949660-20113-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:26:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFd5g47bU+5dEb2FxbT1X0oXgcD0jOkqW7a4WfCxVttRhDSYoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 kunit-next 2/3] kunit: add log test
To:     Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:28 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the
> log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is
> enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>

One minor comment below.

> ---
>  lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> index aceb5bf..0789060 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
> @@ -329,6 +329,31 @@ static void kunit_resource_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
>         .exit = kunit_resource_test_exit,
>         .test_cases = kunit_resource_test_cases,
>  };
> -kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite);
> +
> +static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "put this in log.");
> +       kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "this too.");
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> +                                    strstr(test->log, "put this in log."));
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
> +                                    strstr(test->log, "this too."));
> +#endif
> +}

Would you mind adding some expectations against the suite log? It
might be good for the sake of completeness.

> +
> +static struct kunit_case kunit_log_test_cases[] = {
> +       KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_test),
> +       {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite kunit_log_test_suite = {
> +       .name = "kunit-log-test",
> +       .test_cases = kunit_log_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite,
> +                 &kunit_log_test_suite);
>
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>