Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422928AbWBIRty (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:49:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422929AbWBIRty (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:49:54 -0500 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:50078 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422928AbWBIRtx (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:49:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:50:31 -0500 From: Jeff Dike To: Kirill Korotaev Cc: Kirill Korotaev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, saw@sawoct.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Message-ID: <20060209175031.GB6945@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <43E7C65F.3050609@openvz.org> <20060209021828.GC9456@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <43EB518F.6000905@openvz.org> <20060209154046.GA3814@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <43EB6474.60903@sw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43EB6474.60903@sw.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 771 Lines: 18 On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 06:49:08PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > I mean how CPU time is distributed not only in the case of CPU hogs. For > example, when 2 tasks do cyclic 1 byte transfer via pipe. one of them is > awake, while another goes to sleep. > If both are in one container, will they behave like a CPU hog? So if you have a container with processes taking turns running, so that there is always a running process, does the container as a whole act as a CPU hog? I'll see if I can resurrect it and see. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/