Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp6337023ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:58:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy6VVsYM8vw3fPa8an+Az67BgqkNi2tGHHQNdPIe1QM70ZNGS0hjaAth2kzDSomkWmmK5sJ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:4c7:: with SMTP id a7mr2847309oie.83.1582066705025; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:58:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582066705; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oihDBIXaVoGXUY8Rxf/SUhVqdoQIQh2DPVtjGSE++jEVgjR24fMdaZnt6NOyaflmOP 9Il68lq1mak5yK0taN31xRI6y4KSnDqXp8eT6R4ToSFTl5l+Z45eMA0wkFo8luG58KeJ Rja+Ji+vh7NXuKbyYXwiBQOIFN/+xkutvhvpTOIR16l+5bJ6fMF+PNTb2YjC0rijObzP JJEF/xGcrUryKJ3dmpmmQ9xtorzxNPOnN89A6PhEWiiGqy0XIlIwT+Q5AwvWXmkHavq/ J57eg4J43/cco2PaRPvwfJP8NVjWhQEVK7GLgFXyPSOcGCWgc+wDh3/uUrrmcVm2GXJb MXOg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=FNMoOaZBBl3i9xCcuLKNCWIelNbWmCqc+hWHl4NpXdM=; b=G14Ci8O/psWk86V4ntkuX8RrdRRnyYqhPtjDsD93nwbhPcD8J0DXv1/NmX0EurXS92 sTNPhrmpoZsOmUsoJDKOP29F8qMglnnGjFx6quI6t4br7ZSgbywrfGB4WMrmzjKaze3e zzNQ5hods8GlrxlMdFdV7nxmLWkYeUEDVY6qn2Sc3Ma0y6GpTDsnMM7MRIkIWSP77ADp vVG7f8P6diDunl4GZOf2cmKtR+DRS+TVJntoLJ0ZFWkD6ZaAWHYghtu1UNXQbntejEjn oCS+k6I3v6+QlfIeRQYdDQWd0jH4qmatmAJ1yzqLVQmP1DwRf2qK8qUjCaXGAnLnSz9A JSBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=MTyOyZdH; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a28si130799otd.257.2020.02.18.14.58.12; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:58:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=MTyOyZdH; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727400AbgBRW5p (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:57:45 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:1295 "EHLO hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726427AbgBRW5o (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:57:44 -0500 Received: from hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:56:33 -0800 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:57:43 -0800 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com on Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:57:43 -0800 Received: from [10.110.48.28] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:57:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/16] mm: Tweak readahead loop slightly To: Matthew Wilcox , CC: , , , , , , , , References: <20200217184613.19668-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200217184613.19668-6-willy@infradead.org> X-Nvconfidentiality: public From: John Hubbard Message-ID: <7691abe7-d0e9-e091-b158-764fb624c2d7@nvidia.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:57:43 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200217184613.19668-6-willy@infradead.org> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1582066593; bh=FNMoOaZBBl3i9xCcuLKNCWIelNbWmCqc+hWHl4NpXdM=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:X-Nvconfidentiality:From: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MTyOyZdHZQkMODmo8rlMB/2qEg3HU5pqh9FgRxpYsmGRmONsz8OrRQrreEBM2NRJR 0PWe6O9d1zufzQnZ7Nh6PXVGWI9FIG6u5Ry+tgMofrYVgsctLaciTGIvy+/cW27I6X ozy/zXaexJDMUc/Qb0NIOSo/IRTQ4YUAKJ8AfzrVP0G+gsALpSzt/WUyZkuZM9/H1b pEHxNVaE1Zn1djE6CJLbRxf6pW4SLxI0NCI/PFJCulvIoPdYakDv8H6EHgYany/KqQ +WVDcVH0cvTLVgLvT04N+CZ78lEclF8aBvkeqi/RwbOuHLAT3Vj6DHF81hAcdWMyIY Ygo2o7pN3aTag== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/17/20 10:45 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" > > Eliminate the page_offset variable which was just confusing; > record the start of each consecutive run of pages in the OK...presumably for the benefit of a following patch, since it is not actually consumed in this patch. > readahead_control, and move the 'kick off a fresh batch' code to > the end of the function for easier use in the next patch. That last bit was actually done in the previous patch, rather than this one, right? > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) > --- > mm/readahead.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c > index 15329309231f..74791b96013f 100644 > --- a/mm/readahead.c > +++ b/mm/readahead.c > @@ -154,7 +154,6 @@ void __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, > unsigned long lookahead_size) > { > struct inode *inode = mapping->host; > - struct page *page; > unsigned long end_index; /* The last page we want to read */ > LIST_HEAD(page_pool); > int page_idx; > @@ -163,6 +162,7 @@ void __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, > struct readahead_control rac = { > .mapping = mapping, > .file = filp, > + ._start = offset, > ._nr_pages = 0, > }; > > @@ -175,32 +175,39 @@ void __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, > * Preallocate as many pages as we will need. > */ > for (page_idx = 0; page_idx < nr_to_read; page_idx++) { > - pgoff_t page_offset = offset + page_idx; You know...this ends up incrementing offset each time through the loop, so yes, the behavior is the same as when using "offset + page_idx". However, now it's a little harder to see that. IMHO the page_offset variable is not actually a bad thing, here. I'd rather keep it, all other things being equal (and I don't see any other benefits here: line count is the same, for example). What do you think? thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA > + struct page *page; > > - if (page_offset > end_index) > + if (offset > end_index) > break; > > - page = xa_load(&mapping->i_pages, page_offset); > + page = xa_load(&mapping->i_pages, offset); > if (page && !xa_is_value(page)) { > /* > - * Page already present? Kick off the current batch of > - * contiguous pages before continuing with the next > - * batch. > + * Page already present? Kick off the current batch > + * of contiguous pages before continuing with the > + * next batch. This page may be the one we would > + * have intended to mark as Readahead, but we don't > + * have a stable reference to this page, and it's > + * not worth getting one just for that. > */ > - if (readahead_count(&rac)) > - read_pages(&rac, &page_pool, gfp_mask); > - rac._nr_pages = 0; > - continue; > + goto read; > } > > page = __page_cache_alloc(gfp_mask); > if (!page) > break; > - page->index = page_offset; > + page->index = offset; > list_add(&page->lru, &page_pool); > if (page_idx == nr_to_read - lookahead_size) > SetPageReadahead(page); > rac._nr_pages++; > + offset++; > + continue; > +read: > + if (readahead_count(&rac)) > + read_pages(&rac, &page_pool, gfp_mask); > + rac._nr_pages = 0; > + rac._start = ++offset; > } > > /* >