Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932516AbWBISHf (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:07:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932359AbWBISHf (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:07:35 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:48310 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932516AbWBISHe (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:07:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:04:29 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ashok Raj Cc: ntl@pobox.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com, riel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu, ak@muc.de, 76306.1226@compuserve.com, wli@holomorphy.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Message-Id: <20060209100429.03f0b1c3.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060209090321.A9380@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20060209160808.GL18730@localhost.localdomain> <20060209090321.A9380@unix-os.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 706 Lines: 17 Ashok Raj wrote: > > The problem was with ACPI just simply looking at the namespace doesnt > exactly give us an idea of how many processors are possible in this platform. We need to fix this asap - the performance penalty for HOTPLUG_CPU=y, NR_CPUS=lots will be appreciable. Do any x86 platforms actually support CPU hotplug? Does the ACPI problem which you describe occur with present-CPUs, or only with possible-but-not-present ones? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/