Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp17566ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:49:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJx59/lwkv357ZdMl1mvh7fvra4OdMNLoZcbohY0dfw+zU7O1kfBi8Bha7iQ5XPLsGEcpn X-Received: by 2002:aca:4f4c:: with SMTP id d73mr3141967oib.107.1582073378506; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:49:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582073378; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ycXttdv88FbaMgZ14PlCPlvJ5LpqMxkGHUWklF0waGUquKanwPNqF4+CbPQ2Tb9jiJ Xcu3KG6cumbKpFiTsqcC4wgVMQc5ow1AXbo/sbsCP41ma+BpcQWgOV8/afmbi9jfJaml HflEeL0Ht4/5q5O7r4vsuBFBYkMSYAPHI++6+k3pGhCb1bFp4ysa4YkhpYeswscY9Hj6 XvU3DYLOBe8Ud3bnEISzn3BihaQYCZKL6srdRdGiWKLSvDnRkje8/BDqs19xD49anQij HnZdb+mPZQ+hBwqo4xVV90NWablktFEAEnfVlvJaf5Gw8bMA13alkG28fHrJcyEWRNBo pNXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=UH3IDmpA8z5gal2ML7pd0cStB9p9jlzpO3tNMXaPA/Y=; b=RkMdPwSwxHMsGl9SI16QOUf5y/MOSr7gqD2ZZmrSDsJjU1l1zD9Y8ZzP4HSeotUHVG pOvHVKCab1crt0wQZx8yv0FlkPQcfr9PSMrXWiM6EXAfakR6Bxd0ZK8Ag0AgoeOe9U0x bmiXFtVALSNevZlX0+7NpwLf9Y8kisp0FlMjMPuUrhPq9U3RYTcoAyCxp5c9vfvEnfG9 aZvS7m/c6f96WNfRVPPLw5oS2cIfNMqSwQrbJKd0WuzsLYg/A6pvD2dmAWUloNa4iyIS 2GfAJsm4goTESfB+DWS0YPZ1S7nEC3gXsis03vMfHpttqtovWh+VhhDHuZYxnlMBT9Su sWIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=G46DzT2w; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v18si7948309oic.188.2020.02.18.16.49.25; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:49:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=G46DzT2w; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726829AbgBSAsJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:48:09 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f194.google.com ([209.85.167.194]:46289 "EHLO mail-oi1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726422AbgBSAsJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:48:09 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f194.google.com with SMTP id a22so22104770oid.13; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:48:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UH3IDmpA8z5gal2ML7pd0cStB9p9jlzpO3tNMXaPA/Y=; b=G46DzT2wR7mYuLF4OdUnkxuJ4vV9LkHQlyise1UPaWycBuqVo/+9sYVe8CyABlQv9S FcUJycWUQDFZnNIlbZ+MminrFt5KgbpHqxmdce4wMJYLLh1+CBPEYQPZTlyvHyRgTQ4D HioT4agIrXoLHvU6tXSFFkR9JNa+5dLE6qgA47RPU/52G9HUFaWn2z9XbBhtNaW6QCcU 3c2vd06Z93HYAT/1PC9LJvttO84Hp5cXHLapMrXBB4xuvgpv/f4Fs1sAVVerd5d/NSIH 2IWDe9AJ61HbC/PUwKOgDL36FvElTN+3JEg1tqIzBURSswp6DZZ22wUBNfX/edekr0et aT2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UH3IDmpA8z5gal2ML7pd0cStB9p9jlzpO3tNMXaPA/Y=; b=Lg8SMk8Mkmm+MWvTgCviCJegNSpCWNxzGBYqB8ohpaC1cOAhjEfjitulFj5l62VUgs Ms5CiUnlBdwSf7DRp56KV2uBpz/I4ZAQq9BPyyMeWC5P1S7YyNUZg332pIMDs0fjKATl HoeKc5bOdytQoRNjPeczcjz6ekRuTapvV5k9GWVl3ZpgDeHt6BYKp/d7cDwqjauqLp1B l9crm1RHPq9aROPH6QHSPRBtHnC9sztA6Wwjl2gjvO4FYcgYS7O1juNZx0TFDiW50MGl 8hTG9nJEbTKSXblz0gnkzxeXt+DuJ/CPQv1rG0zft8t3Yo9q1Cq6a++I6JtCvNMBl4xj i05g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxeRlK9Va/M2P17HOJaUeuuJZy/JvFfvjOgmQCp05bjoKDp1OD 0znR9UpzNs8wYXE5P7JOsx5fyilK1gjkemKQeNRuSKFOfRw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:249:: with SMTP id m9mr3124374oie.5.1582073287013; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:48:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1582022829-27032-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <87zhdg84n6.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87zhdg84n6.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> From: Wanpeng Li Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:47:56 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: LAPIC: Recalculate apic map in batch To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: LKML , kvm , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 20:24, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Wanpeng Li writes: > > > From: Wanpeng Li > > > > In the vCPU reset and set APIC_BASE MSR path, the apic map will be recalculated > > several times, each time it will consume 10+ us observed by ftrace in my > > non-overcommit environment since the expensive memory allocate/mutex/rcu etc > > operations. This patch optimizes it by recaluating apic map in batch, I hope > > this can benefit the serverless scenario which can frequently create/destroy > > VMs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li > > An alternative idea: instead of making every caller return bool and > every call site handle the result (once) just add a > KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC flag or a boolean flag to struct kvm. I > understand it may not be that easy as it sounds as we may be conunting > on valid mapping somewhere before we actually get to handiling Yes. > KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC but we may preserve *some* > recalculate_apic_map() calls (and make it reset KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC). Paolo, keep the caller return bool or add a booleen flag to struct kvm, what do you think? Wanpeng