Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:37:14 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To:     Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@google.com>
Cc:     Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com>
Subject: Re: BLKSECDISCARD ioctl and hung tasks
Message-ID: <20200219013714.GB31488@ming.t460p>
References: <CAKUOC8VN5n+YnFLPbQWa1hKp+vOWH26FKS92R+h4EvS=e11jFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200213082643.GB9144@ming.t460p>
 <d2c77921-fdcd-4667-d21a-60700e6a2fa5@acm.org>
 <CAKUOC8U1H8qJ+95pcF-fjeu9hag3P3Wm6XiOh26uXOkvpNngZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <de7b841c-a195-1b1e-eb60-02cbd6ba4e0a@acm.org>
 <CACVXFVP114+QBhw1bXqwgKRw_s4tBM_ZkuvjdXEU7nwkbJuH1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKUOC8Xss0YPefhKfwBiBar-7QQ=QrVh3d_8NBfidCCxUuxcgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200215034652.GA19867@ming.t460p>
 <CAJmaN=miqzhnZUTqaTOPp+OWY8+QYhXoE=h5apSucMkEU4nvtA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJmaN=miqzhnZUTqaTOPp+OWY8+QYhXoE=h5apSucMkEU4nvtA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:11:53AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 7:47 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> > What are the 'other operations'? Are they block IOs?
> >
> > If yes, that is why I suggest to fix submit_bio_wait(), which should cover
> > most of sync bio submission.
> >
> > Anyway, the fix is simple & generic enough, I'd plan to post a formal
> > patch if no one figures out better doable approaches.
> 
> Yeah I think any block I/O operation that occurs after the
> BLKSECDISCARD is submitted will also potentially be affected by the
> hung task timeouts, and I think your patch will address that.  My only
> concern with it is that it might hide some other I/O "hangs" that are
> due to device misbehavior instead.  Yes driver and device timeouts
> should generally catch those, but with this in place we might miss a
> few bugs.

We may add a warning(device name, request, ...) when one IO isn't completed in
sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs, so this device misbehavior still can be
caught.

> 
> Given the nature of these types of storage devices though, I think
> that's a minor issue and not worth blocking the patch on, given that
> it should prevent a lot of false positive hang reports as Salman
> demonstrated.

OK, I will post it soon.


Thanks,
Ming