Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp76859ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:08:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0Ualrm/qq17NNBEUURd9REh6Rzn1NdeXsgPGqlwoQvaOBDXMetIwSbtpJeYT6QUGwN1Hr X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7696:: with SMTP id j22mr19092757otl.188.1582078105651; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:08:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582078105; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0EnvZWQ/uE7FtmOUZbsq3JhZTtjJXH1zuvV6HTIz3iazdosgt7ZjlPy/S9EW2sje3z FkozkNVfbyEtl/F80Mdtt8pwHrggGbx9Cnjv2dR7rFysetKSOuOf41F8Wev1ZZRnfiMS 3LveK9hfn8yhpGzLQsYD0i2gbw/uWcxjWfPMzTnYW+rlgbQPc87ppcNOxka8zoEtkyJ2 +kT7DXqMuSunFEK1SZGEpeJBZUCAw8xrnd7L0gEgqpbE5fhGvauEmLN04MKSKUpuX8+2 /+LwfgZ7S7KZOAiL5//CM4g3qzKHNH3XmaZbTnv/p4KXH8nvDcsyIhcKiS+mEgWd0/d3 Sirw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=lHO9ef+TRFmx/RlloUnTh7v1FCHJJMOmp5iP1BC6pPY=; b=SdF358Hkdzll8lYIqpWRDMMaq3iOS17rXCdWXfLSfcFjLEQQny78UILXhS2MRC09q9 g9KlRGMcIAvYex6DzlH9Vlm1gevu8V0B9jKr3n9nATEYtQ5HzRYe7XY4OSe++h5sI11x QmkVYT7/wFZyRqyQ1JTBp61YS+9wL2jVy0BCub25q3mfi+EyHTiaeSbt7Zd83Nd5YHtJ pmAYVU2gRkgn28/0iwRphkr+eHYX+uM4E6EhPvyQwRC6/jTztqaVoKZ2TXY740/nLtOQ zIZoATdgohIHVmqgwLJ2HAZk6YIWyxRxlrz3K3ybykjjhUUTPxvdOvPkxo+MJb5VgJKX Ctog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=KCDvIX5E; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i20si8447201oie.119.2020.02.18.18.08.03; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:08:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=KCDvIX5E; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728063AbgBSCCw (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:02:52 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46284 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727811AbgBSCCw (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:02:52 -0500 Received: from dragon (80.251.214.228.16clouds.com [80.251.214.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 458AC206DB; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:02:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582077771; bh=zZgKpAVTcS0HFTReo92vS7ROv9M5SlQjFcvItuZaouo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KCDvIX5ESx+/fv2GnQodDCuhBF3i33bgdk0P29bY4M65DN6YnkPaUL8Eq89/mUfa9 CHCnzIHCRkXPfC8R9b8lqwJyoRn5SpyfY3uDcf36X2cHocrVtDhl00zts6aYUhpUqg 8rZ+Sis0tKo+8K56bw/I3farjiXEOpmhwXx5QUfI= Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:02:45 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Leo Li Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: defconfig: enable additional drivers needed by NXP QorIQ boards Message-ID: <20200219020244.GG6075@dragon> References: <1581382559-18520-1-git-send-email-leoyang.li@nxp.com> <1581382559-18520-2-git-send-email-leoyang.li@nxp.com> <20200217053730.GB6042@dragon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:44:09PM +0000, Leo Li wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shawn Guo > > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2020 11:38 PM > > To: Leo Li > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: defconfig: enable additional drivers needed > > by NXP QorIQ boards > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:55:59PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > > > This enables the following SoC device drivers for NXP/FSL QorIQ SoCs: > > > CONFIG_QORIQ_CPUFREQ=y > > > CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV=y > > > CONFIG_MSCC_OCELOT_SWITCH=y > > > CONFIG_CAN=m > > > CONFIG_CAN_FLEXCAN=m > > > CONFIG_FSL_MC_BUS=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_NAND_FSL_IFC=y > > > CONFIG_FSL_ENETC=y > > > CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_VF=y > > > CONFIG_SPI_FSL_LPSPI=y > > > CONFIG_SPI_FSL_QUADSPI=y > > > CONFIG_SPI_FSL_DSPI=y > > > CONFIG_GPIO_MPC8XXX=y > > > CONFIG_ARM_SBSA_WATCHDOG=y > > > CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m > > > CONFIG_FSL_MC_DPIO=y > > > CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_FSL_DPAA2_CAAM=m > > > CONFIG_FSL_DPAA=y > > > CONFIG_FSL_FMAN=y > > > CONFIG_FSL_DPAA_ETH=y > > > CONFIG_FSL_DPAA2_ETH=y > > > > > > And the drivers for on-board devices for the upstreamed QorIQ > > > reference > > > boards: > > > CONFIG_MTD_CFI=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_CFI_ADV_OPTIONS=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_CFI_INTELEXT=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_CFI_AMDSTD=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_CFI_STAA=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_DATAFLASH=y > > > CONFIG_MTD_SST25L=y > > > CONFIG_EEPROM_AT24=m > > > CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307=y > > > CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF85363=y > > > CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF2127=y > > > CONFIG_E1000=y > > > CONFIG_AQUANTIA_PHY=y > > > CONFIG_MICROSEMI_PHY=y > > > CONFIG_VITESSE_PHY=y > > > CONFIG_MDIO_BUS_MUX_MULTIPLEXER=y > > > CONFIG_MUX_MMIO=y > > > > > > The following two options are implied by new options and removed from > > > defconfig: > > > CONFIG_CLK_QORIQ=y > > > CONFIG_MEMORY=y > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Li Yang > > > > This is too much change in a single patch. It should be split properly to make > > review and merge easier, considering arm-soc folks are cautious to those 'y' > > options. > > Ok. So probably separating them based on different subsystems will be good? It would be too many patches if I separate for each individual config option. Yep, subsystem should be good. And for those 'y' options, please state why they need necessarily to be 'y'. Shawn