Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp121654ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:13:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8b0F3Qs2gcEYf7AXpE0mKnZWzl72R7p6rpvVc3hD2jivx4B8A34wcb5UrTqjPpGhquw2P X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:346:: with SMTP id j6mr3519107oie.47.1582082014383; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:13:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582082014; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xU3kTrVcrD1pJ+K1YnUENQheK4CIqZi/onMprRwK7euRUFPXR2SUf59gc893vw1XEN HxjbTTmv8dEAc2buDVsqeLPS8m+bkowlFcQaLFoUT6kfHdakRFW7DqbswlgHd33EXeiK AJwVRq00hdUUxGpOIbuR/WIYVvO+l8Citz0RYpfD4hOZGTLl+heORVYIag95uYLS+tLT 1cj58Kb0FsRMkYcfuheILWh+KRqUDpnBgRRi9NZ92R8uUdcaR7DxL3sd2SABS9gqvhmL DJwLrU//DrSrOe/UsMrAYEOMaCjnXRGnKnBFJGMdALdCPfMMCQSUDA9AYMNQG1zt4CT9 YIdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=UlM3P0ty6uH2+fjLQtXWhCXKl4rvEtxt0uIjSFge6+Q=; b=ujngkLA8XEQKqt8eajKaqCmu5QU7578tAhVYzCpPKWsaasJclCfxG5A4hWT/ZcHNXy e72/VXJ13wfbOOR4rUTMopZaUB0g3X1VCUVz+aQrsZMI/tLPezbLhG9xGGUJoCTTi/zQ aB4xzyfjV/UIVCXvt3cvvtUP3lAz0XKocEUR+16wOZbiCJRc1h1AbwOItP1dEm9xCaT8 NBGzKSU9b88kVBPJg4R7hQCKeDx78QzZlw8pe79JESLPTu6TBF7n8S0n9hffjjEbxguy 0eoOlerQbsgPlSvW/KNdObNjWaqQhcTChLFU8ijFqs+uu47uEPHnaezY1qcbJbyszE6I 0o4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d28si9033044oic.47.2020.02.18.19.13.22; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:13:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728260AbgBSDNA (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:13:00 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:10215 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728219AbgBSDNA (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:13:00 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B6A5C55E6B2C8D28D29B; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:12:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:12:53 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: avoid __GFP_NOFAIL in f2fs_bio_alloc To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: , , References: <20200218102136.32150-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <20200219024928.GA96609@google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <52705a9b-306b-c6b0-0f48-c12149e7b915@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:12:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200219024928.GA96609@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/2/19 10:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 02/18, Chao Yu wrote: >> __f2fs_bio_alloc() won't fail due to memory pool backend, remove unneeded >> __GFP_NOFAIL flag in __f2fs_bio_alloc(). > > It it safe for old kernels as well when thinking backports? ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 134) struct bio *bio = mempool_alloc(bs->bio_pool, gfp_mask); It looks if we have a backend mempool, we will never fail to allocate bio for very long time, we don't need to backport to 2.6.x kernel, right? Thanks, > >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >> --- >> fs/f2fs/data.c | 12 ++++-------- >> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c >> index baf12318ec64..3a4ece26928c 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c >> @@ -54,17 +54,13 @@ static inline struct bio *__f2fs_bio_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, >> return bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, &f2fs_bioset); >> } >> >> -struct bio *f2fs_bio_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int npages, bool no_fail) >> +struct bio *f2fs_bio_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int npages, bool noio) >> { >> - struct bio *bio; >> - >> - if (no_fail) { >> + if (noio) { >> /* No failure on bio allocation */ >> - bio = __f2fs_bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, npages); >> - if (!bio) >> - bio = __f2fs_bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOFAIL, npages); >> - return bio; >> + return __f2fs_bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, npages); >> } >> + >> if (time_to_inject(sbi, FAULT_ALLOC_BIO)) { >> f2fs_show_injection_info(sbi, FAULT_ALLOC_BIO); >> return NULL; >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> index 5316ac3eacdf..65f569949d42 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> @@ -3343,7 +3343,7 @@ void f2fs_destroy_checkpoint_caches(void); >> */ >> int __init f2fs_init_bioset(void); >> void f2fs_destroy_bioset(void); >> -struct bio *f2fs_bio_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int npages, bool no_fail); >> +struct bio *f2fs_bio_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int npages, bool noio); >> int f2fs_init_bio_entry_cache(void); >> void f2fs_destroy_bio_entry_cache(void); >> void f2fs_submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >> -- >> 2.18.0.rc1 > . >