Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp126186ybv; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:19:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxP1C24kxN34Kam4337bCEdBqVz19dyVW8voCMeBAvO1wkRoCMUKf+uG/we98r1agBJj4Do X-Received: by 2002:aca:a9c3:: with SMTP id s186mr2921102oie.31.1582082385607; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:19:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582082385; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vu8x+uUMgsk+bduTTifqiBwbojW9em8yhSCBsVuKZ1g3xjna9Q8H0CUTbvVMUMBLPw w1KQkiYPnd4Jr8sg87020aOjmJPtQO0vsLq2B4UzbROBza5R0zUA4bwnfMnloBEnlmJM jek+t2uhldTQlQqDWd2WJ7wKhZDIkOA1zbYH1dyTjydGfhJlk544WgGya10+TgEi19uE +EzNZ/5K/fI346mnokx6JieUdZyMIlzhXMeHkOukapB2hk3W8wly56Mno3zbDGixjCts /JlwjbpB4zGj5n995Cb0LMTcbn1Es+G/UYv/GgyU9nzOc4PC/4mSW1BGldnaDZ3ZA4tY ugzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=wrYQNbvfuDPnxD93wn7O0cc2EQYK1CANQPYgnRc0BPU=; b=d2cuGuaYBOh4gkUC4dTumCH6rBJf/MsuHgPRzeY+QGN0LvTmyuDI+9wFYg/u4MBGxj tnSp2GkJwLhSC4U7dHcRIIlpi8eigrjHuTkzcDpp8XmXNC6dlQvGVqVhbaOcEkGIRBG4 /EgYuS+yDiGlhLj9xETLD7QCJSDYQTZ7N+bXmtRIAaSf3Qr0g0iqscCXRlcBjgcWB+m2 afmNOIrST/+QaUptKQN+cEE8PqO3w5427An606/z4DNJu3+H4Mzd1ebTF5CU8bXGuYLn z9430JxfJWNDJm4+gpGr0Ze62RL8VPXhrtwPaXnzRusReCPMWUEI5fyy+BpLromCcV9P of+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a20si427445otf.271.2020.02.18.19.19.33; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:19:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728285AbgBSDSW (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:18:22 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:53424 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728260AbgBSDSW (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:18:22 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 092E8BD6156035A3226A; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:18:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:18:15 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: avoid unneeded barrier in do_checkpoint() To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: , , References: <20200218102136.32150-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <20200218102136.32150-3-yuchao0@huawei.com> <20200219025154.GB96609@google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <576f8389-ba27-b461-5466-cc62e84b5c92@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:18:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200219025154.GB96609@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/2/19 10:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 02/18, Chao Yu wrote: >> We don't need to wait all dirty page submitting IO twice, >> remove unneeded wait step. > > What happens if checkpoint and other meta writs are reordered? checkpoint can be done as following: 1. All meta except last cp-park of checkpoint area. 2. last cp-park of checkpoint area So we only need to keep barrier in between step 1 and 2, we don't need to care about the write order of meta in step 1, right? Thanks, > >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >> --- >> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c >> index 751815cb4c2b..9c88fb3d255a 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c >> @@ -1384,8 +1384,6 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc) >> >> /* Flush all the NAT/SIT pages */ >> f2fs_sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO); >> - /* Wait for all dirty meta pages to be submitted for IO */ >> - f2fs_wait_on_all_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META); >> >> /* >> * modify checkpoint >> -- >> 2.18.0.rc1 > . >