Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750764AbWBIUPJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:15:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750766AbWBIUPJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:15:09 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:22158 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbWBIUPI (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:15:08 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: Terminate process that fails on a constrained allocation V3 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:14:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: akpm@osdl.org, pj@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200602092105.04412.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602092114.51517.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 686 Lines: 18 On Thursday 09 February 2006 21:12, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Doing this all properly would probably get quite messy. > > I'd say making overcommit working nicely with MPOL_BIND is yet another > fundamental issue for the policy layer but it does not matter for this > patch. I agree. Your patch is ok by me, although I think the earlier simpler patches would have done as well (it's slightly overengineered). But not too bad. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/