Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp408422ybv; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:02:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFjT5bJaPBQktlxxJRb0hk7XTwTvMTkkknCBCa1oEu55XfxNKv/NbBmmrsj5tMpndrTXxw X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2c2a:: with SMTP id f39mr18530995otb.301.1582106573359; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:02:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582106573; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YAk6d03ipw8TMHkocQlraXZOwhjFPtqQaB8AhoQnCmZmhcnk2zoG4IqBxkyip+iVWi tsnjA/C8rLBRgk1B3tNZBo9x/dS8Gd6doY12zSdj49tdEZ0IRKPnW3qkIwl12gOgbCql HfzvjctCuYBCIKriaytc7cGp/SNL2bVu9BVcTfhJqqp1qpsFMrC6z2eSUafPJrXqk2Sb 18wUw05xqQM3Nltz0FKg+/a8+8mVHgu32FcWJ2bLdS2Igejp/G1z4ZBJ2cYTGOJ5F5A9 WkvSs6BUovCc+seJoNKz+BHc19D0IaWi3inON9AVxnVPc+W6HazKdVmbkbizEhrssZPj TfwA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=z1m2XzYdCC2EaIAOcE3eSxjEb3D78KxFwI9M6TVol+c=; b=tQF0N4ZnqxxB9/1qxs/+igGKVhmOsf9HxN3tRV0eYwn52uXIf7iCGko3HaquxKhn4b HW37JQeC2E+jk9DthyUBrwBoOpoMNAuldo6T6kirfSmu0xfozJuaR52dNGsLu1C5ALjm +YqjQPqGsgcOCKqRNiRvxlMradkTOqPZS5vASwNqeUEdB7uJz1AnIEuQhjC1wxOurISU Q+jlzWISGncoxBHtoiqMxRCMPllw5oakjFxc7kJcdHHSpGf6TbwUK/lUHhcqfq71s7Ag 6AR5Iq2rkG5L8XIDiVL+94Gj0Gei8RW6z40u0M3b18abdaWo7Dl6wHAKyGzF5m/mgmeE J8EA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@st.com header.s=STMicroelectronics header.b=Sn+9Xhit; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=st.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l23si787654otj.302.2020.02.19.02.02.40; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 02:02:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@st.com header.s=STMicroelectronics header.b=Sn+9Xhit; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=st.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726776AbgBSKAv (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:00:51 -0500 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:57684 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726548AbgBSKAv (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:00:51 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046661.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01J9wZjc011866; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:00:37 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=STMicroelectronics; bh=z1m2XzYdCC2EaIAOcE3eSxjEb3D78KxFwI9M6TVol+c=; b=Sn+9XhitQzasfJTKQ0SbQjEp9IuAz8JOhnhQvKQj6ZUMg4bGFllAXN5CuYaMooooQ/dt 8d4R9Hf2qrASI3VJ2wpdd3ZxYB9qsB4gS2fAGeqp4JQKEtO7FLn0ftSgyg2FpEpFF7Hx IicR5Uv+IXa1YLWhbl6P6X7NVJ/73tkDAiIBa/qGaOKSg6FlhK/zzv8enr4kvVs1vWwo yHcmcWqmqFHZDmQ9clL89WDoI6RmdcYXJppthNBOJp7cv7dO/YpBokspmtbDoQ5aY8Ae qXH7oHyqP5tTX30uu4a9uEP0mLSTFhlv542gg0X6POMzDVmaBZzc4GHVx3nJjPfG6N1l OA== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2y8uafj8rw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:00:37 +0100 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 3846D100038; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:00:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag3node2.st.com [10.75.127.8]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id B22C621F697; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:00:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from lmecxl0912.lme.st.com (10.75.127.47) by SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:00:33 +0100 Subject: Re: msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to ci_hdrc.0.ulpi To: Andy Shevchenko , Jack Pham CC: Peter Chen , Naresh Kamboju , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , open list , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org" , Linux-Next Mailing List References: <20200219013824.GB8602@b29397-desktop> <20200219024534.GB10078@jackp-linux.qualcomm.com> From: Alexandre Torgue Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:00:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.47] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG5NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.13) To SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-19_02:2020-02-19,2020-02-19 signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andy On 2/19/20 10:23 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:46 AM Jack Pham wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:38:22AM +0000, Peter Chen wrote: >>> On 20-02-17 14:02:57, Naresh Kamboju wrote: >>>> arm64 APQ 8016 SBC ( Dragonboard 410c) device running Linux next boot >>>> failed due to below error. >>>> >>>> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x410fd030] >>>> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200217 (oe-user@oe-host) >>>> (gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Feb 17 04:27:31 UTC 2020 >>>> [ 0.000000] Machine model: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ 8016 SBC >>>> <> >>>> [ 4.439291] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.448891] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.457879] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.467331] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.475636] mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001 >>>> [ 4.478895] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 DS2008 7.28 GiB >>>> [ 4.480629] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 DS2008 partition 1 4.00 MiB >>>> [ 4.484719] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 DS2008 partition 2 4.00 MiB >>>> [ 4.492247] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.502611] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 DS2008 partition 3 4.00 MiB, >>>> chardev (234:0) >>>> [ 4.506949] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.517901] random: fast init done >>>> [ 4.521420] mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR104 SDHC card at address aaaa >>>> [ 4.523400] mmcblk1: mmc1:aaaa SL16G 14.8 GiB >>>> [ 4.532843] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.539131] mmcblk0: p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 p11 p12 p13 p14 >>>> [ 4.542309] mmcblk1: p1 >>>> [ 4.561843] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.573481] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.585283] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.592622] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.600074] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.607204] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>>> [ 4.614679] msm_hsusb 78d9000.usb: failed to create device link to >>>> ci_hdrc.0.ulpi >>> >>> The chipidea USB code hasn't changed recently. Would you please bisect >>> which commit affect it? >> >> Probably same cause as for this: >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206435 > > Yes, it's the same. I dunno why no fix yet available. > Kishon has posted a patch yesterday for device link issue in phy core. Please see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/18/272 regards Alex