Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750741AbWBIWst (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:48:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750766AbWBIWst (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:48:49 -0500 Received: from mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.165]:12492 "EHLO mail24.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbWBIWss (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:48:48 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Implement Swap Prefetching v22 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:48:26 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , ck list , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Jackson References: <200602092339.49719.kernel@kolivas.org> <200602100047.09722.kernel@kolivas.org> <43EB4FD5.20107@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <43EB4FD5.20107@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602100948.27601.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1439 Lines: 29 On Friday 10 February 2006 01:21, Nick Piggin wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > I really don't want to go throwing out pagecache without some smart > > semantics and then swap in random stuff that could be crap I agree. The > > answer to this is for the vm itself to have an ageing algorithm like the > > clockpro stuff which does this in a smart way. It could certainly age > > away the updatedb wrinkles and leave some free ram - which would help/be > > helped by prefetching. > > AFAIK clockpro will not leave free ram, will it? > > Getting a little hand-wavy; I don't think the updatedb problem needs to > be fixed by a really fancy page reclaim algorithm (IMO, and that's not to > say that a fancy reclaim algorithm wouldn't be nice for other reasons). > Just small improvements here and there, and there will always be a tradeoff > between throughput and interactive pagein latency so in the end it might > need a tunable (hey there is one - maybe it needs to be improved) Well I have a handful of patches for just that issue... However they all fall into the "it's too hard to prove to Andrew and Nick that they help" so I've never bothered trying to push them to mainline. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/