Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:33:05 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] docs: add a script to check sysctl docs
Message-ID: <20200219103305.733b7db9@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200219162527.61f99f45@heffalump.sk2.org>
References: <20200218125923.685-1-steve@sk2.org>
        <20200218125923.685-8-steve@sk2.org>
        <20200219034416.4d82dc16@lwn.net>
        <20200219162527.61f99f45@heffalump.sk2.org>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:25:27 +0100
Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org> wrote:

> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only    
> > 
> > By Documentation/process/license-rules.rst, that should be "GPL-2.0"; the
> > absence of a "+" means "only".  
> 
> Ah, thanks, I hadn’t noticed that. I’m used to the SPDX identifiers listed on
> the LF website, https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html in this case.
> (I’m not alone apparently, see “git grep GPL-2.0-only”...)

The SPDX tags got changed at some point, but the kernel community
declined to follow along.  We're being difficult as usual...:)

Thanks,

jon