Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp933170ybv; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:14:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPtitevBiyoabaAFvI3bZF5TTBZVmAIbQSMoyFo/jWYG6138r7gxndu1YqA6zVmvrXHuFd X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14c3:: with SMTP id t3mr6848641otq.213.1582143244111; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:14:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582143244; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EYx6GKO58oItEIM5ouMCOsnTA/0PQmzcYTOgnpDIGKmN6xIKOiukkMPSFAe7YLOWRX gYGx+anobn62FHZK0sSJYiSs2GNae8KnRZnuAuTQr8laIEyDB6uRo3S/ovv2Ysx0+7bm RT99qgO+ASDHFujjsKFX0VmRBlW6vqkFtsGIxhrCMQ7GaqewyiNckHsuLWpl7WuG7JUT 3O0+rRKnu1605o16vH7GSbMwex17SY+HFONzO1Ly5ux95AsCLfwMdfPOrk9wIS8TY5HW CAn62UbnVMUz9GkGw17Lj29wLIeIEEKyAHWn7FZsa+s9Y404CCzmFHLsq+DNkUG9dtp8 I4+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=42MaK4n6+CrelpQTjPFZO9NB2S0O1OTsWCtSJ9pIv6o=; b=m4TWAZcam4jb6in0VRovw/MX3a5Nrvdaf7Yvuu8SPKLaZ49Js2+lVFLQ0mpoeEYlnH 98ZyMNDJB/LC52aXK4ODu61Jwa0smvGilP+Tl6C+BznGwkMbWBAdm2vWyW9f+rmY76ie IXLJdABxexQq5WgFuek4etA9JIKT+S9Yy86nsnsEVFTCL4lMEzbzOGeDephUz3/MLyoU xMMtO3ut8IY7QDGAhXFFCtdGk+UNXPup4Kjt/04EtGtgXQ7yfjl5T800uSKfwTIDX9zc fc5OPySrQ+zaND7N2f+HyLm/dWYaEadOj89138oWyIzzwxFy3P4gDIJ2UnC87uDaoGAb h+pg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KZjz6JeV; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t127si10442323oih.45.2020.02.19.12.13.52; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=KZjz6JeV; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726713AbgBSUMe (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:12:34 -0500 Received: from mail-vk1-f195.google.com ([209.85.221.195]:42281 "EHLO mail-vk1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726634AbgBSUMe (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:12:34 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f195.google.com with SMTP id c15so509822vko.9 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:12:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=42MaK4n6+CrelpQTjPFZO9NB2S0O1OTsWCtSJ9pIv6o=; b=KZjz6JeV1vFYXt8q0wyrdwBhXZ/8rzg3LVXGgnEjLp0yccOlrd9L+Ok9CSnmEDAScF 5DXgdCokxyl/DepQSJRvQZcSN+CE8Kcr0SWpEfzBMCL7WlKU8JPwmUJCsE2rI7Vb7lKV bgQULZyhEbb7MwpvmgaQHsqZa8CaNOAvokqUXRgGKlW538y3zdoMMZdFUy60Yhv2WJdn xOhNioYtaDA8ydHmJeTzDTHNO8vInpQ9cb9Ph5Mu9jvt5hFURbjsN43FQ7NZbkVfeBb2 LHRWZWKArxzLHQPRZfP/szxqEcv4AqpjRJQcw8TGu10OvO3/JnOO2GhuCUA9yjJvEBPV ehWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=42MaK4n6+CrelpQTjPFZO9NB2S0O1OTsWCtSJ9pIv6o=; b=Z8BhsKge4kFfCpHTxFnaYFm30Z1SnWHzVIPCHHNXPl9EXvQppcGvBILGM3DhwQIGPl RVbLuYoHKEm6+ZJhBXv6OUYDIB+Gw/8/pgWCFqO8gMlyhP7j2TFvzl97NWpcZUPnGXW5 1A3cMi5ZsreplbhzGVjIA0zkfcgbAkCzNV35gZauzjQKjZ7BrB089mkdDjVhPBhrEkjB pUGrcSs5auicTgMRS7Jv+E7MX3/Dw+PiZbaCvnzBMb/YyqlmRIF5Gcsfbfr8Phy96/2g jf+zVPbcDXuwOxLkYT/DDDSc89r3EjZAH5L5DiEGDja9y7aUuE1AbX5qnfbs40g7kj41 /APA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+IZrAR8pUqZgGgYYoNGLnrjD5nS6YqNbNFvkefwOsky5M5/72 Aot86DSTWe2hLlbMeZ4p+6M3yLGReDuuNnc9KoYqEg== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:4541:: with SMTP id s62mr12216061vka.59.1582143153200; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:12:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191018161033.261971-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20200219000817.195049-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <0386ecad-f3d6-f1dc-90da-7f05b2793839@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <0386ecad-f3d6-f1dc-90da-7f05b2793839@arm.com> From: Sami Tolvanen Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:12:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] add support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack To: James Morse Cc: Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , Dave Martin , Kees Cook , Laura Abbott , Nick Desaulniers , Jann Horn , Miguel Ojeda , Masahiro Yamada , clang-built-linux , Kernel Hardening , linux-arm-kernel , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:38 AM James Morse wrote: > This looks like reserving x18 is causing Clang to not-inline the __kern_hyp_va() calls, > losing the vitally important section information. (I can see why the compiler thinks this > is fair) Thanks for catching this. This doesn't appear to be caused by reserving x18, it looks like SCS itself is causing clang to avoid inlining these. If I add __noscs to __kern_hyp_va(), clang inlines the function again. __always_inline also works, as you pointed out. > Is this a known, er, thing, with clang-9? I can reproduce this with ToT clang as well. > I suspect repainting all KVM's 'inline' with __always_inline will fix it. (yuck!) I'll try > tomorrow. I think switching to __always_inline is the correct solution here. Sami