Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp989376ybv; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:30:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzHBMTbzZy/gNwGYEHBs2nEqbvtUbtHKTYGeDSlY3xX9+Bq8lIIdPvXz5HpcZZenbN5/gs2 X-Received: by 2002:a9d:75da:: with SMTP id c26mr21211962otl.40.1582147818238; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:30:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582147818; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mKLG68LbEBGuFnzMQnBqQUIqMqyy3jaPReV1y4gNHOJmYpyT59rPXpeRMH7myjxKgj llFfWQaEGbs0TFb0VYKVBQVOU8XyiCOYzI7Mg3Gb1+bUhTEsT25Vavk8dQ6cUOCHRkkL wAdRccpRdtwdildicvMkgPPz5VFEf4a9/WiTi6UftbXH4VRGYoWva+M6dQENkK+2+auj UWBxUnbW5nNErEHDyaeQX+Ahu9dV5EdXFX4i3/IhXva5LPJ3bCpsntOSOaBuQPi8pOLz sk14GhpHe8rXO0i45QHVNgFv1t56dldj6hcv3l1LQ/B0+0aZr5vOJQuIAYV1vAqJAW0x /yfQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=tflHgM16xPXF2V7VrDVR1yM9aEYSRRxoFxI551CH6Pw=; b=SVU2tkvBjcL077CMd5DW9UuFwdfiSP+xyGFLhxGSdHfZbrWkmJqBMQx+tI5zLxdvkm LRFWd8iOFN90FOQLfVVM6ddicP228/mqz0wxZkAxdBxhi22vF31m7YMsjAz8gMwdmXE1 UiMQ4mrVEnaWvLkQzFVdppD28sNYp7BhZEcSadBpLV3SwCrH97EpC4qn3Gt0u+80+ENw gkAU0jYKNL+Jm2uQt5nNusVw2nvzACwNld83eq/ermljeCTHVk0Bfoz7scT1nnX0kJZu /VB4edzKOzBg944AgJ/qcODR1NLfPDlWS+DiK3ORbPBeeE7mcyk8mP0OVElu9feTtIsW gnow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t192si9690744oif.75.2020.02.19.13.30.05; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:30:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727485AbgBSVaB (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:30:01 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:32818 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726760AbgBSVaA (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:30:00 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Wuf-00AJkC-UU; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:29:46 +0100 Message-ID: <855dec1f598d8b43400089cd0c5a7ac9b3533fc7.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists From: Johannes Berg To: Arend Van Spriel , Amol Grover , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Joel Fernandes , Madhuparna Bhowmik , "Paul E . McKenney" Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:29:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <407d6295-6990-4ef6-7d36-e08a942607c8@broadcom.com> (sfid-20200219_222746_459969_817073EC) References: <20200219091102.10709-1-frextrite@gmail.com> <407d6295-6990-4ef6-7d36-e08a942607c8@broadcom.com> (sfid-20200219_222746_459969_817073EC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 (3.34.2-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 22:27 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 2/19/2020 10:13 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 14:41 +0530, Amol Grover wrote: > > > > > > - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held()); > > > - > > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, &rdev->sched_scan_req_list, list) { > > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, &rdev->sched_scan_req_list, list, > > > + lockdep_rtnl_is_held()) { > > > > Huh, I didn't even know you _could_ do that :) > > Me neither ;-). Above you are removing the WARN_ON_ONCE() entirely. > Would it not be good to keep the WARN_ON_ONCE() with only the > !rcu_read_lock_held() check. Not needed, the macro expansion will already contain rcu_read_lock_any_held() just like in all the other cases where you pass a lockdep condition to RCU helpers. johannes