Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp268985ybv; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:12:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqysdJd/6+I5LJbVJAJ6Dyve1EyWOCrII3h9EOSgzh2Abg8rAt9V+YJdD/b+7sMKPV0HfIzn X-Received: by 2002:aca:c401:: with SMTP id u1mr845144oif.62.1582175545167; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:12:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582175545; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TRttgBQ89dqFVLulip8UyWLxkhtnxNu0WiyZZn279TgI+XF4wfFDvU7A6du0B8kv0c eHAZofjD3KvqW8EUlYa9WHyfBADsUtb4qTTNRmNQE1M8nPj70YaXdA8yjvZk3MerMegL Pnn++4EZGZnWuJZJt0ItSCxa/y99mQfHoLECxgOYr85MJtK9MtVUsQBBpZGSRx3S624x QTjsg8t5iDanMdCGlMQA+Uil50Cx6L0J+Zux0SSUgX8L1ihczLZ8JEP2PwPitASumoGh +/N0f/T4n4miiDLmYINB6oH99qBNb0Y6tcvVtyhvUrDz47oAuLsuzKgztk5QKlMd+Pi0 +eiQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=PXsHQpQUNW95gXG+/io5CxBAipvpDLdz3aihm0hoJSA=; b=rT1ihAQOQZFXUTH/BXRmQE2iJchJpsL1gpQZx2HrTbGsPLinFe41vMcihphAwivxCd QYIcM9LkLZUfDes1fogCvq51i12yZkApREz5m08NBi8VGGwNakd+9euYfQ6Ey4PwotnL ivoAXP7pOirfTtmPjndNw0x8LQmt8nVJjJUYa0Sm1MgbGGU4u/KSUGB2UNPfh5CbsrvU zGtt6LlxS0/FgUoaolJLuO40HaJLLfOtERVEivdHRxiTk5fL6dttSwUf4BMLRCpzv+ZL oBh/1sk+Wknmej9IpVYhGPhF+OzXTzxmD9aN77AVeZXcdADv11G/H9/lrwRXqXfLXnGm Zh5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=c0d2g94D; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h11si1120889otr.197.2020.02.19.21.12.12; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:12:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=c0d2g94D; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726044AbgBTFMD (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:12:03 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:38824 "EHLO mail-pl1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725811AbgBTFMD (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:12:03 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id t6so1063480plj.5 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:12:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=PXsHQpQUNW95gXG+/io5CxBAipvpDLdz3aihm0hoJSA=; b=c0d2g94Dm1Z6TDD+jf2dSAEdajK53Baoy6TUcby18IXEJ4U3P2BZR2BVqIeZEklCQG tKiAKq86rOlnhIKCsKMDdHOGsmZr/x06rjeXzqCAlbz3Dkntj47lYSqqHU4nH8mq9k41 g8nXdf/KFzuRpr2e+7ftD/wCvJ6QxujBgjEXL2MVbYNuIGD9nvwzCU0YLF+ZOFqMZSsz Hh+D9SxaBSt665M9esm3778bB4cEYrEWC3ToFQRQKsootUMVCdVUxM3+Jh8sdfTiFnNE ve95p/3Xe5CvKvnTHD8PGzwHt26oX16ovmAJklQ7FFvs0p/aT7zoZ7naj2JtPSuC9sGr k7Ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=PXsHQpQUNW95gXG+/io5CxBAipvpDLdz3aihm0hoJSA=; b=IiR+qKpP0Z/+bSEXLSYSnsjBZn/ywYUWjyLYrpJ30nf5UjGL8DGXxxFGJT+oO/a8ak 2vaFmBvRp0WSYYU/RVakRTBx+YHSUi+Dwk8geLg/zAmLbBzmmBgP0HgDNODUtOcW3HdN v4kWICog7YMcIxlgbvMkQnPGLwS1Bp/mdA8b4SkPDHmZm56/j7m467uZF/K/AyfxVlz+ ngfjY52Q5bpJ8STdh4pxN0v2dtaVCSKMkVmBXEuOfqeKg9lO4F2inGJmzU2dGxk2G8H9 Zf/dZ4VeH/QBOmdgHBHycKuU2XFaI0O3s6bXPNUaakdSpp4aSDeh//By753f9kfcFq5T 4DKA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWEjkGHbjDC6fhTpArrLJ/mIJf8OZ1X66Lde47n4zzW0nzgzn5K 5EAqZ9X2KEmX3BCwW9znqkY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6ac7:: with SMTP id i7mr28017355plt.314.1582175522464; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:12:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([114.206.198.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t15sm1472599pgr.60.2020.02.19.21.11.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:12:01 -0800 (PST) From: js1304@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Hugh Dickins , Minchan Kim , Vlastimil Babka , Mel Gorman , kernel-team@lge.com, Joonsoo Kim Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] workingset protection/detection on the anonymous LRU list Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:11:44 +0900 Message-Id: <1582175513-22601-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Joonsoo Kim Hello, This patchset implements workingset protection and detection on the anonymous LRU list. * Changes on v2 - fix a critical bug that uses out of index lru list in workingset_refault() - fix a bug that reuses the rotate value for previous page * SUBJECT workingset protection * PROBLEM In current implementation, newly created or swap-in anonymous page is started on the active list. Growing the active list results in rebalancing active/inactive list so old pages on the active list are demoted to the inactive list. Hence, hot page on the active list isn't protected at all. Following is an example of this situation. Assume that 50 hot pages on active list and system can contain total 100 pages. Numbers denote the number of pages on active/inactive list (active | inactive). (h) stands for hot pages and (uo) stands for used-once pages. 1. 50 hot pages on active list 50(h) | 0 2. workload: 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(uo) | 50(h) 3. workload: another 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(uo) | 50(uo), swap-out 50(h) As we can see, hot pages are swapped-out and it would cause swap-in later. * SOLUTION Since this is what we want to avoid, this patchset implements workingset protection. Like as the file LRU list, newly created or swap-in anonymous page is started on the inactive list. Also, like as the file LRU list, if enough reference happens, the page will be promoted. This simple modification changes the above example as following. 1. 50 hot pages on active list 50(h) | 0 2. workload: 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(h) | 50(uo) 3. workload: another 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(h) | 50(uo), swap-out 50(uo) hot pages remains in the active list. :) * EXPERIMENT I tested this scenario on my test bed and confirmed that this problem happens on current implementation. I also checked that it is fixed by this patchset. I did another test to show the performance effect of this patchset. - ebizzy (with modified random function) ebizzy is the test program that main thread allocates lots of memory and child threads access them randomly during the given times. Swap-in/out will happen if allocated memory is larger than the system memory. The random function that represents the zipf distribution is used to make hot/cold memory. Hot/cold ratio is controlled by the parameter. If the parameter is high, hot memory is accessed much larger than cold one. If the parameter is low, the number of access on each memory would be similar. I uses various parameters in order to show the effect of patchset on various hot/cold ratio workload. My test setup is a virtual machine with 8 cpus and 1024MB memory. Result format is as following. Parameter 0.1 ... 1.3 Allocated memory size Throughput for base (larger is better) Throughput for patchset (larger is better) Improvement (larger is better) * single thread 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 <512M> 7009.0 7372.0 7774.0 8523.0 9569.0 10724.0 11936.0 6973.0 7342.0 7745.0 8576.0 9441.0 10730.0 12033.0 -0.01 -0.0 -0.0 0.01 -0.01 0.0 0.01 <768M> 915.0 1039.0 1275.0 1687.0 2328.0 3486.0 5445.0 920.0 1037.0 1238.0 1689.0 2384.0 3638.0 5381.0 0.01 -0.0 -0.03 0.0 0.02 0.04 -0.01 <1024M> 425.0 471.0 539.0 753.0 1183.0 2130.0 3839.0 414.0 468.0 553.0 770.0 1242.0 2187.0 3932.0 -0.03 -0.01 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.02 <1280M> 320.0 346.0 410.0 556.0 871.0 1654.0 3298.0 316.0 346.0 411.0 550.0 892.0 1652.0 3293.0 -0.01 0.0 0.0 -0.01 0.02 -0.0 -0.0 <1536M> 273.0 290.0 341.0 458.0 733.0 1381.0 2925.0 271.0 293.0 344.0 462.0 740.0 1398.0 2969.0 -0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 <2048M> 77.0 79.0 95.0 147.0 276.0 690.0 1816.0 91.0 94.0 115.0 170.0 321.0 770.0 2018.0 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.11 * multi thread (8) 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 <512M> 29083.0 29648.0 30145.0 31668.0 33964.0 38414.0 43707.0 29238.0 29701.0 30301.0 31328.0 33809.0 37991.0 43667.0 0.01 0.0 0.01 -0.01 -0.0 -0.01 -0.0 <768M> 3332.0 3699.0 4673.0 5830.0 8307.0 12969.0 17665.0 3579.0 3992.0 4432.0 6111.0 8699.0 12604.0 18061.0 0.07 0.08 -0.05 0.05 0.05 -0.03 0.02 <1024M> 1921.0 2141.0 2484.0 3296.0 5391.0 8227.0 14574.0 1989.0 2155.0 2609.0 3565.0 5463.0 8170.0 15642.0 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.08 0.01 -0.01 0.07 <1280M> 1524.0 1625.0 1931.0 2581.0 4155.0 6959.0 12443.0 1560.0 1707.0 2016.0 2714.0 4262.0 7518.0 13910.0 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.08 0.12 <1536M> 1303.0 1399.0 1550.0 2137.0 3469.0 6712.0 12944.0 1356.0 1465.0 1701.0 2237.0 3583.0 6830.0 13580.0 0.04 0.05 0.1 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.05 <2048M> 172.0 184.0 215.0 289.0 514.0 1318.0 4153.0 175.0 190.0 225.0 329.0 606.0 1585.0 5170.0 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.14 0.18 0.2 0.24 As we can see, as allocated memory grows, patched kernel get the better result. Maximum improvement is 21% for the single thread test and 24% for the multi thread test. * SUBJECT workingset detection * PROBLEM Later part of the patchset implements the workingset detection for the anonymous LRU list. There is a corner case that workingset protection could cause thrashing. If we can avoid thrashing by workingset detection, we can get the better performance. Following is an example of thrashing due to the workingset protection. 1. 50 hot pages on active list 50(h) | 0 2. workload: 50 newly created (will be hot) pages 50(h) | 50(wh) 3. workload: another 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(h) | 50(uo), swap-out 50(wh) 4. workload: 50 (will be hot) pages 50(h) | 50(wh), swap-in 50(wh) 5. workload: another 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(h) | 50(uo), swap-out 50(wh) 6. repeat 4, 5 Without workingset detection, this kind of workload cannot be promoted and thrashing happens forever. * SOLUTION Therefore, this patchset implements workingset detection. All the infrastructure for workingset detecion is already implemented, so there is not much work to do. First, extend workingset detection code to deal with the anonymous LRU list. Then, make swap cache handles the exceptional value for the shadow entry. Lastly, install/retrieve the shadow value into/from the swap cache and check the refault distance. * EXPERIMENT I made a test program to imitates above scenario and confirmed that problem exists. Then, I checked that this patchset fixes it. My test setup is a virtual machine with 8 cpus and 6100MB memory. But, the amount of the memory that the test program can use is about 280 MB. This is because the system uses large ram-backed swap and large ramdisk to capture the trace. Test scenario is like as below. 1. allocate cold memory (512MB) 2. allocate hot-1 memory (96MB) 3. activate hot-1 memory (96MB) 4. allocate another hot-2 memory (96MB) 5. access cold memory (128MB) 6. access hot-2 memory (96MB) 7. repeat 5, 6 Since hot-1 memory (96MB) is on the active list, the inactive list can contains roughly 190MB pages. hot-2 memory's re-access interval (96+128 MB) is more 190MB, so it cannot be promoted without workingset detection and swap-in/out happens repeatedly. With this patchset, workingset detection works and promotion happens. Therefore, swap-in/out occurs less. Here is the result. (average of 5 runs) type swap-in swap-out base 863240 989945 patch 681565 809273 As we can see, patched kernel do less swap-in/out. Patchset is based on v5.5. Patchset can also be available at https://github.com/JoonsooKim/linux/tree/improve-anonymous-lru-management-v2.00-v5.5 Enjoy it. Thanks. Joonsoo Kim (9): mm/vmscan: make active/inactive ratio as 1:1 for anon lru mm/vmscan: protect the workingset on anonymous LRU mm/workingset: extend the workingset detection for anon LRU mm/swapcache: support to handle the value in swapcache mm/workingset: use the node counter if memcg is the root memcg mm/workingset: handle the page without memcg mm/swap: implement workingset detection for anonymous LRU mm/vmscan: restore active/inactive ratio for anonymous LRU mm/swap: count a new anonymous page as a reclaim_state's rotate include/linux/mmzone.h | 14 ++++++++----- include/linux/swap.h | 18 ++++++++++++----- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 +- mm/huge_memory.c | 6 +++--- mm/khugepaged.c | 2 +- mm/memcontrol.c | 12 ++++++++---- mm/memory.c | 16 +++++++++------ mm/migrate.c | 2 +- mm/shmem.c | 3 ++- mm/swap.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- mm/swap_state.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- mm/swapfile.c | 2 +- mm/userfaultfd.c | 2 +- mm/vmscan.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- mm/vmstat.c | 6 ++++-- mm/workingset.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 16 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4