Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:56:18 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc:     paulmck@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, elver@google.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] fork: annotate a data race in vm_area_dup()
Message-ID: <20200220125618.o2p6be2hjfgatynw@box>
References: <1582122495-12885-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1582122495-12885-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:28:15AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> struct vm_area_struct could be accessed concurrently as noticed by
> KCSAN,
> 
>  write to 0xffff9cf8bba08ad8 of 8 bytes by task 14263 on cpu 35:
>   vma_interval_tree_insert+0x101/0x150:
>   rb_insert_augmented_cached at include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:58
>   (inlined by) vma_interval_tree_insert at mm/interval_tree.c:23
>   __vma_link_file+0x6e/0xe0
>   __vma_link_file at mm/mmap.c:629
>   vma_link+0xa2/0x120
>   mmap_region+0x753/0xb90
>   do_mmap+0x45c/0x710
>   vm_mmap_pgoff+0xc0/0x130
>   ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d1/0x300
>   __x64_sys_mmap+0x33/0x40
>   do_syscall_64+0x91/0xc44
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
>  read to 0xffff9cf8bba08a80 of 200 bytes by task 14262 on cpu 122:
>   vm_area_dup+0x6a/0xe0
>   vm_area_dup at kernel/fork.c:362
>   __split_vma+0x72/0x2a0
>   __split_vma at mm/mmap.c:2661
>   split_vma+0x5a/0x80
>   mprotect_fixup+0x368/0x3f0
>   do_mprotect_pkey+0x263/0x420
>   __x64_sys_mprotect+0x51/0x70
>   do_syscall_64+0x91/0xc44
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> vm_area_dup() blindly copies all fields of original VMA to the new one.
> This includes coping vm_area_struct::shared.rb which is normally
> protected by i_mmap_lock. But this is fine because the read value will
> be overwritten on the following __vma_link_file() under proper
> protection. Thus, mark it as an intentional data race and insert a few
> assertions for the fields that should not be modified concurrently.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov