Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932066AbWBJM5k (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:57:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751256AbWBJM5k (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:57:40 -0500 Received: from ns9.hostinglmi.net ([213.194.149.146]:41425 "EHLO ns9.hostinglmi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751163AbWBJM5j (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:57:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:58:38 +0100 From: DervishD To: Joerg Schilling Cc: peter.read@gmail.com, matthias.andree@gmx.de, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <20060210125838.GA2810@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Schilling , peter.read@gmail.com, matthias.andree@gmx.de, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net References: <43E9F1CD.nail2BR11FL52@burner> <20060208210219.GB9166@DervishD> <20060208211455.GC2480@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <43EB1988.nail7EL2I7AN6@burner> <20060209145740.GB94@DervishD> <43EB62CA.nailCFH31KKTA@burner> <20060209173351.GA432@DervishD> <43EC7199.nailISD1164I0@burner> <20060210114505.GB2750@DervishD> <43EC882E.nailISDFNVTCC@burner> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <43EC882E.nailISDFNVTCC@burner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: DervishD X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns9.hostinglmi.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dervishd.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 957 Lines: 27 Hi Joerg :) * Joerg Schilling dixit: > DervishD wrote: > > > What is your intent for writing this? > > > > My intention is to get real proofs about the "brokenness" of the > > patch, not just an "It is completely broken". That's not technical. > > That's the same than saying "Windows sucks". Now, tell why it sucks, > > in technical terms. > > > > So why don't you look at the patch then? I've done it. I told in my first message. Have you done it? Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/