Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:52:13 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, osalvador@suse.de,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
        robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/sparse.c: move subsection_map related codes
 together
Message-ID: <20200220215213.GA14195@richard>
Reply-To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
References: <20200220043316.19668-1-bhe@redhat.com>
 <20200220043316.19668-7-bhe@redhat.com>
 <20200220061832.GE32521@richard>
 <20200220070420.GD4937@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
 <20200220071233.GA592@richard>
 <20200220085559.GE4937@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200220085559.GE4937@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 04:55:59PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 02/20/20 at 03:12pm, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >On 02/20/20 at 02:18pm, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:33:15PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >> >No functional change.
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >> Those functions are introduced in your previous patches.
>> >> 
>> >> Is it possible to define them close to each other at the very beginning?
>> >
>> >Thanks for reviewing.
>> >
>> >Do you mean to discard this patch and keep it as they are in the patch 4/7?
>> >If yes, it's fine to me to drop it as you suggested. To me, I prefer to put
>> >all subsection map handling codes together.
>> >
>> 
>> I mean when you introduce clear_subsection_map() in patch 3, is it possible to
>> move close to the definition of fill_subsection_map()?
>> 
>> Since finally you are will to move them together.
>
>Oh, got it. Yeah, I just put them close to their callers separately. I
>think it's also good to put them together as you suggested, but it
>doesn't matter much, right? I will consider this and see if I can adjust
>it if v3 is needed. Thanks.

Yes, doesn't matter much.

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me