Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:59:40 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
Message-ID: <20200221105940.44fd67f1@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <CAOFY-A2tK5=eFt2AQx+FOjyHXQ85XE-N8gdbb49wJphjAAgFUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200217145711.4af495a3@canb.auug.org.au>
        <CAOFY-A1nfPjf3EcQB6KiEifbFR+aUtdSgK=CHGt_k3ziSG6T_Q@mail.gmail.com>
        <CAOFY-A3q_pmtHKAoOJdbB09wy=dxs9SdpXjCsU1wBxU5EDHVmw@mail.gmail.com>
        <20200221101845.21c0c8c5@canb.auug.org.au>
        <CAOFY-A2ndGCSEDstOmXs-u1XjNsaj8wkLezYsMbzeZeVTJGC5g@mail.gmail.com>
        <20200221104328.0f897efd@canb.auug.org.au>
        <CAOFY-A2tK5=eFt2AQx+FOjyHXQ85XE-N8gdbb49wJphjAAgFUQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/n=+M1qFwCmphl3AY.Cq.mx5";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/n=+M1qFwCmphl3AY.Cq.mx5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Arjun,

On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:44:28 -0800 Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:43 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> w=
rote:
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:22:04 -0800 Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> wrot=
e: =20
> > >
> > > I have a possible solution in mind, but it would involve a slight
> > > change in the SPARC macro (to be more inline with the semantics of the
> > > other platforms).
> > > If you're open to such a change, I can send it out. =20
> >
> > Its not up to me :-)
> >
> > If it is not too much work, I would say, do the patch, test it as you
> > can, then send it out cc'ing the Sparc maintainer (DaveM cc'd) and see
> > what happens.
>=20
> Certainly, I will do so.

Just one thing: its worth while making it clear to DaveM that you just
want his Ack (rather than for him to take the patch into the Sparc
tree) so that the patch can go into Andrew's tree along with the rest
of the series.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/n=+M1qFwCmphl3AY.Cq.mx5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl5PHWwACgkQAVBC80lX
0GwXiwf+NAqXQ9gETVZZgq6sHUVnJj0/G11Axq+1O3yLWOEi8RpsRq8Fv0Gzg9oE
l+yil+FOsWiCI5huwAGcHtBFe3D1Q98/qZSSS/tKVTLEbMpKXMCLbODv++66dyxy
Pw3ugAeuJd7aWBlnA9RCMnD80X3k2yThO6UNZRvtx0GKs/yvokvF6g8ivKNKJFwf
69czhR6nPVC1w+Lzqo98V9GZrMPfrh6n7eIvu0wXXiEBe8uPZgRvTkgU+2pLOYTD
gvZpVO7bwd47a37XkBJx8bk23mdbCbi48jwMCBHgC7f/ep5rht6s8X12UCR+S4K9
OZCwdguRNneS4yr48PulWpOnBPP0bA==
=nMVK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/n=+M1qFwCmphl3AY.Cq.mx5--