Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:33:44 +0800
From:   Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To:     linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: hv: Generify pci-hyperv.c
Message-ID: <20200221023344.GJ69864@debian-boqun.qqnc3lrjykvubdpftowmye0fmh.lx.internal.cloudapp.net>
References: <20200210033953.99692-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200210033953.99692-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Ping ;-)

Any suggestion or plan on this patchset?

Thanks and Regards,
Boqun

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:39:50AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is the first part for virtual PCI support of Hyper-V guest on
> ARM64. The whole patchset doesn't have any functional change, but only
> refactors the pci-hyperv.c code to make it more arch-independent.
> 
> Previous version:
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200121015713.69691-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200203050313.69247-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
> 
> Changes since v2:
> 
> *	Rebased on 5.6-rc1
> 
> *	Reword commit logs as per Andrew's suggestion.
> 
> *	It makes more sense to have a generic interface to set the whole
> 	msi_entry rather than only the "address" field. So change
> 	hv_set_msi_address_from_desc() to hv_set_msi_entry_from_desc().
> 	Additionally, make it an inline function as per the suggestion
> 	of Andrew and Thomas.
> 
> *	Add the missing comment saying the partition_id of
> 	hv_retarget_device_interrupt must be self.
> 
> *	Add the explanation for why "__packed" is needed for TLFS
> 	structures.
> 
> I've done compile and boot test of this patchset, also done some tests
> with a pass-through NVMe device.
> 
> Suggestions and comments are welcome!
> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> Boqun Feng (3):
>   PCI: hv: Move hypercall related definitions into tlfs header
>   PCI: hv: Move retarget related structures into tlfs header
>   PCI: hv: Introduce hv_msi_entry
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h     |  8 ++++++
>  drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 43 ++---------------------------
>  3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.24.1
>