Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 04:02:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 04:02:03 -0400 Received: from mail1-gui.server.ntli.net ([194.168.222.13]:40134 "EHLO mail1-gui.server.ntli.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 04:01:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:02:22 +0100 From: Nick Craig-Wood Message-Id: <200110180802.f9I82Mm21621@irishsea.craig-wood.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paul Gortmaker , vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl, willy tarreau Subject: Re: Making diff(1) of linux kernels faster In-Reply-To: <200110180025.f9I0Ps8t004928@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> In-Reply-To: <200110180025.f9I0Ps8t004928@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Horst von Brand wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?q?willy=20tarreau?= said: > > Be very careful not to modify a multi-linked file, or > > it will be damaged in all trees and won't be seen by > > diff. your editor must unlink before saving. > > Most don't. ed(1), vi(1) and emacs(1) are careful tro write to the very > same file. jed(1) is the only outlier I'm aware of... emacs does mv file file~ before saving file so the edited file will not be linked byt the backup file will be. You can stop it doing this by setting backup-by-copying-when-linked. $ echo "Test1" >> test1 $ ln test1 test2 $ emacs test2 # modify and save the file $ ls -i test* 2491498 test1 2491500 test2 2491498 test2~ However as Horst von Brand noted if you try this with (standard) vi you will edit the linked file which is the same behaviour as if you set backup-by-copying-when-linked in emacs. -- Nick Craig-Wood ncw@axis.demon.co.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/