Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:31:14 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Alex Davis <alex14641@yahoo.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Let's get rid of  ide-scsi
Message-ID: <20060210163114.GA26203@kroah.com>
References: <20060210002148.37683.qmail@web50201.mail.yahoo.com> <20060210003614.GA26114@animx.eu.org> <20060210052404.GB29421@kroah.com> <20060210121107.GC27814@animx.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060210121107.GC27814@animx.eu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 923
Lines: 26

On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:11:07AM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:36:14PM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > 
> > > I am also against the seperate USB block layer, I personally saw no use in
> > > it.
> > 
> > What "seperate USB block layer"?
> 
> Maybe not a "block layer", but there was this Under drivers/block devices in
> the config:
> Low Performance USB Block driver

What is your objection to this driver?  It fills a real need for people
who do not want the whole scsi stack in their kernels (embedded, memory
constraints, closed systems, etc.), and probably is not even considered
"Low Performance" anymore.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/