Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1788865ybv; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:31:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxqxgWPvoHRAcLwmovV8vs5N5V2+FCyW9Z/U7OBT6YlPF8E20pf6USBci0G7XV+SzOSqKpT X-Received: by 2002:aca:4106:: with SMTP id o6mr1561821oia.173.1582284705349; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:31:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582284705; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=orYEkNWsQ8KNEej/vAN/rnmk2aguKIh1XErx7pmk7i5Jnqn0k5C/87bX/tLb6dP+K9 JJfL3A/pYHvB3b9Ls297XB/gramKdPhG/gcrYQToY+AbkJS2NfhKatdTmtSUtPh45wls p1+9N1uflKl693VrROuL4GQ4NmZbS1CQbAPgcGBTMHPKFkfPdWlNptIfPxT7KvjsSRUW 9ioYxwi+A+Kn9qZvxCB6VSJSNniGxprIGp7Mgyr8bMdfMDMaoqL02LkmpoZd1BSK9soP 9kDlfPoG6CysRwrTeZogvjInLMHkeN4ZhUxO39c+FcVJUTk16Sypm/+WubzMSu7OX5uM H0cg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to :reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=8CwKS+68g6rYXvBPUNMj65VlzPkXRT4niHPD0Ocf4G8=; b=mYQKQApmdDHYxKhUh4DW9W1vqT6PnfNwrONLVs8sMocQtRbID6QBCtx4EVMwmPVSuG TBEcTCfYSFh7EIfRbVb6qnKl9h07BcMvu9x4xvPRUNnonN8VziSTlq6seI3Qb5U+1R51 lRIqnbt8LeXGEg4ACqnrdUzGczzQ6aZHb9MMrkh2ec/Eq5iS5yy8nhk+eDSkugJyRn0H C6LyQ0RlfT/TkDO1yn3zV0se7lPUvWUqtW+XvPRbpthBIyv2QfOF0XwLmcDkgBjAPXeP of1aPnl2DYYtFEw53617vy4nZaK1vofk7E9GiQbtDzw+KzUcChG0OywE1YM0ufGFa/J7 jg9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a17si1291425otp.236.2020.02.21.03.31.33; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:31:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727646AbgBULaV (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:30:21 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53814 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727046AbgBULaU (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:30:20 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05511AC66; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id BF10DDA70E; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:30:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:30:00 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Sterba , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Josef Bacik , Nikolay Borisov Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree Message-ID: <20200221113000.GC2902@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Josef Bacik , Nikolay Borisov References: <20200220092344.2a738574@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200220092344.2a738574@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:23:44AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent': > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4425:20: error: passing argument 1 of 'btrfs_pin_extent' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > 4425 | btrfs_pin_extent(fs_info, ins->objectid, ins->offset, 1); > | ^~~~~~~ > | | > | struct btrfs_fs_info * > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2609:49: note: expected 'struct btrfs_trans_handle *' but argument is of type 'struct btrfs_fs_info *' > 2609 | int btrfs_pin_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ > > Caused by commit > > 4e2c2f96e6a3 ("btrfs: Make btrfs_pin_extent take trans handle") > > interacting with commit > > bd727173e443 ("btrfs: handle logged extent failure properly") > > from the btrfs-fixes tree. > > I have applied the following merge fix patch for today. Sorry, I'll fix the branch in the next for-next snapshot.