Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1791099ybv; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:33:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxqNwSp/oCR5RrP89RCSy8WnvWjnyyJVme+gqstXC7ogwU06p/wL5776nBzFN1SVDD2rY5X X-Received: by 2002:aca:49cd:: with SMTP id w196mr1545666oia.15.1582284830983; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:33:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582284830; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bAKhjkSPM8NkWbmNtvh4dLLx6z57m+TnBI7UFfTe6FN8ewJmn03WwertVp3SiRrmkw fp2dlogLBjGWynkG9Qu9XsgqCMwKKjCtCuOkwT3kI4r6l/hou2oV0WCKCEG2BOSiaux5 x6YY9S/D5F0RIiHT1rWG7kcOpTJvUf/L4oCaUfFbPFr16X8a3R/lO3cVBhzU26RaOGXN +W7p/LimeC/qYo0OrZByJe+YoImLQe90tacfinobgbE8xuBRyy6/W60g61EOMvv/jp4x uyJywV5bhFzUiETQfV9HrIcM0U53wKjsLIGZ0RCH4ZIhESdgNEa7Cj2kbEs3NcLY8p8U LDog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to :reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=D9iG8S7R5l9fAdkc6gmH2DRaKssT2oCqRU8hYpEC3fc=; b=CHFx4MfAwxq4on4JLeTwLieLO8CXdjx4hkvpBu3FLWj2NW7uIYR1UYOk6kCzzTMVc0 qgQ/YdYycfYSTpvbKDGLnKenyAleKwmLf6oXB4ebJC40aVKGDhmHr4FpAbwfLWDWFJyH 5l07MMfFBfIekcZSTfnLrYeAjN1v/YySQkHXC6mVLYuFtXNWsOC3iy3O8RmTsdgg29FA E/s+1oqnO9/ci8aZsZIbCtAfTZjxo63NUzBgadw7XYidp2XcrakVh1IRXaeUUZC+JtgS tMu/REDF00Oel/gI5kd9dwrEGH4En7HP9byrp200JbD/0aIC3Vy//Usxz+CwkjEqYj71 PgiA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l4si640497oib.170.2020.02.21.03.33.38; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:33:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727107AbgBULdW (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:33:22 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55050 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726325AbgBULdW (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:33:22 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828BFAE07; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 30E82DA70E; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:33:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:33:03 +0100 From: David Sterba To: David Sterba Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Josef Bacik , Nikolay Borisov Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree Message-ID: <20200221113303.GD2902@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Josef Bacik , Nikolay Borisov References: <20200220092344.2a738574@canb.auug.org.au> <20200221113000.GC2902@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200221113000.GC2902@twin.jikos.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:30:00PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:23:44AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent': > > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4425:20: error: passing argument 1 of 'btrfs_pin_extent' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > > 4425 | btrfs_pin_extent(fs_info, ins->objectid, ins->offset, 1); > > | ^~~~~~~ > > | | > > | struct btrfs_fs_info * > > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2609:49: note: expected 'struct btrfs_trans_handle *' but argument is of type 'struct btrfs_fs_info *' > > 2609 | int btrfs_pin_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ > > > > Caused by commit > > > > 4e2c2f96e6a3 ("btrfs: Make btrfs_pin_extent take trans handle") > > > > interacting with commit > > > > bd727173e443 ("btrfs: handle logged extent failure properly") > > > > from the btrfs-fixes tree. > > > > I have applied the following merge fix patch for today. > > Sorry, I'll fix the branch in the next for-next snapshot. Actually I can't fix that locally, the next-fixes branch compiles and for-next also compiles. The merge into linux-next needs to resolve the conflict, so your fixup will be needed until the next-fixes batch is merged to master (rc3 or rc4).