Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog()
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
        Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200220130149.26283-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
 <20200220130149.26283-2-geert+renesas@glider.be>
 <CACRpkdbgsR1n1qj3HmQWcEjeDdN85N1Mw8kLOUAeDjESW36MDg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d2b87102-fdf3-f22f-8477-5b2105d9583b@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:18:33 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbgsR1n1qj3HmQWcEjeDdN85N1Mw8kLOUAeDjESW36MDg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Linus, Rob,

On 2/21/20 10:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:01 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
> 
>> Extract the code to add all GPIO hogs of a gpio-hog node into its own
>> function, so it can be reused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>> ---
>> v2:
>>   - No changes.
> 
> Patch applied with Frank's Review tag.

I created a devicetree unittest to show the problem that Geert's patches
fix.

I would prefer to have my unittest patch series applied somewhere,
immediately followed by Geert's patch series.  This way, after
applying my series, a test fail is reported, then after Geert's
series is applied, the test fail becomes a test pass.

Can you coordinate with Rob to accept both series either via
your tree or Rob's tree?

-Frank

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>