Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2196145ybv; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:43:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2sbkv2MQWJqnvzzH2NcFjpggm2IgCSVnQ4h1I9+sG9CQTNWBpMucXU3EyRup6cEy+tzP9 X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2dea:: with SMTP id g97mr29652725otb.33.1582310605227; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:43:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582310605; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=suc4zdmPC9xOVdZHmJ3PoS3aKt1vLdYNp7cC3UQdzRVuX5koyNMxrluFOJugeuZQYA ZOE9sXZ0UMAUPj0ZSuIcgDOVnPGrZd1xF0ni/1h9zT809Z+36P9x4/rv0vbKMGoeSp2N 8uUlT3lTLEg4drWaG7kY4PuYsWxVuDzr02pGKZHV8toHeYSCAuQhR8eQ+PuFwIVea7mP 3sGtgO2ug4CaEPc3M5YDB7/wZmWnD8+abqOryfY6rPkwSVRlKPGMEobOJCcotZrYJ/Qi 5JPiMdvt887N8rrjCI/LID8JBg7gsri/qZjbUQ27jsrTipS9IfssWjVrWmiJNt4tqqlV UjTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=/zFjPXs4Y0NII72nGSRDk19t/a2aSWdxIBmz8i14jj8=; b=Uvr6D2Nbdn9SuxzowYjo+PpMIXCwRXboTpKJuF09EJZNwHgyFYQGj7DFJTlQcVQzQC cMTkWXzQxg75+Ru2c5LEjJaUWSNdzQrj0EPRUskYFdjWGZzFxJMbseMctB5PJSOFYa5x mgZwVrTAFfkhzsYcMeiJ5RB9vHTqneWRAGTfQ0EgUT7ik1Uinm/1Y2bKwpt5nHu0iGLU iXRP454+x1uRf4X5dU7fvAh/t6+o+j4RQiYwcpDeODt68kMrD0isxpaSHR5rf7XlLeN6 ZjbMMzYQnGfQbn7RSWe72IyAuYHq1x+9NVZkxiS8HjZFMKRCTBX8Ta6aUR26f05SXvIq RVXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=hCV5wWMM; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l11si1841594otn.189.2020.02.21.10.43.12; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:43:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=hCV5wWMM; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729608AbgBUSmm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:42:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:40824 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726150AbgBUSml (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:42:41 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id z7so1407176pgk.7 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:42:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/zFjPXs4Y0NII72nGSRDk19t/a2aSWdxIBmz8i14jj8=; b=hCV5wWMM4cj4NHSEYugwASyRMDbDo8/O1XzigZpry9yvw78/0/WW0Zb/+PByjS+dnS t39vasXj+xV1yHSE5KV+Xg0cfO2Sh4INtkPkmpucjn6/cXEqrtlimCp6n6sEJ9UD9HQK 9+RCkL9Bk6a166KPk86lHBeTL5ZnN6W+l3Lt/VmwoKdM/Amn8yACwR6D3ArLlzj+wceT 8RX1nmyINH2kFfdrrhn3gBMqlirmWfIpji+GYK7I3GEelOiJ/2fb6BMG+Uu/h/5WFl7z EMJ60wbsOd5mb5AqH/XDNafeGkYZ9BZP9EMQTkCX3JZvQDa4Yx0MXubWmu/hWJ6pIhLu 1Vjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/zFjPXs4Y0NII72nGSRDk19t/a2aSWdxIBmz8i14jj8=; b=qvdfUQuVZmP/BYwIbcZZT3WeTkmSbUZ98RNcKLWVNh1DD+GIeFH3j/dBdBi1oqeC5V uDXwQk6NR/TKoBj8LtnwwHkKogZCvq8WgjPgdEsdC/qJnPc6Y8mxfwldbYkry6L2gQFJ z7LcGBH0f+6ouGoY4CSWzdrySq6hObMSBSkl3EBUzDWfAUuYli5PjhXDYQSGeyoqlLMp uRgGia+QtsX7YQgxoJ8f/gh46K+3ux9oqeczaEcTBGnagk3quz+jYxOGmeZJjLSwYc9g ZMQqgmy7p+e74KaI8Vhf7tpu+w4YOUE3D22uAb8u5Qus9w1fFaZlcsOrd3f/8jhowSyJ XICw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXPVWgii0B6agVAYZawl0gEU+aUQ0Piwe81uQiW9orMSlsTKvjw 7ra0qkmoQyH/WctWkhSnyDvZKw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:fe4d:: with SMTP id x13mr38950714pgj.147.1582310559562; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps15 (S0106002369de4dac.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.8.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x28sm3181371pgc.83.2020.02.21.10.42.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:42:36 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: peng.fan@nxp.com Cc: ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] remoteproc: add support to skip firmware load when recovery Message-ID: <20200221184236.GA10368@xps15> References: <1582097265-20170-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> <1582097265-20170-4-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1582097265-20170-4-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Peng, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:27:39PM +0800, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > Remote processor such as M4 inside i.MX8QXP is not handled by Linux > when it is configured to run inside its own hardware partition by > system control unit(SCU). So even remote processor crash reset, it is > handled by SCU, not linux. To such case, firmware load should be > ignored, So introduce skip_fw_load_recovery and platform driver > should set it if needed. For now I will not comment on the code - I just need clarifications on the scenario. In the specific case you are trying to address here, I understand that when the M4 crashes, the SCU will recognize that and reload the MCU firmware. Does the SCU also start the MCU or is that left to the remoteproc subsystem? Thanks, Mathieu > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 876b5420a32b..ca310e3582bf 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -1678,20 +1678,23 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) > if (ret) > goto unlock_mutex; > > - /* generate coredump */ > - rproc_coredump(rproc); > + if (!rproc->skip_fw_load_recovery) { > + /* generate coredump */ > + rproc_coredump(rproc); > > - /* load firmware */ > - ret = request_firmware(&firmware_p, rproc->firmware, dev); > - if (ret < 0) { > - dev_err(dev, "request_firmware failed: %d\n", ret); > - goto unlock_mutex; > + /* load firmware */ > + ret = request_firmware(&firmware_p, rproc->firmware, dev); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "request_firmware failed: %d\n", ret); > + goto unlock_mutex; > + } > } > > /* boot the remote processor up again */ > ret = rproc_start(rproc, firmware_p); > > - release_firmware(firmware_p); > + if (!rproc->skip_fw_load_recovery) > + release_firmware(firmware_p); > > unlock_mutex: > mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock); > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > index 4fd5bedab4fa..fe6ee253b385 100644 > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ struct rproc { > bool has_iommu; > bool auto_boot; > bool skip_fw_load; > + bool skip_fw_load_recovery; > struct list_head dump_segments; > int nb_vdev; > }; > -- > 2.16.4 >