Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp229519ybv; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:43:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx1IldcbDd6ubbPPWGIocsbhPbVYD3e5ntpHl6FRzem7L1QMIa+ycYXauGl6b9lYfQmbVGh X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4c8c:: with SMTP id m12mr33249793otf.312.1582368193472; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:43:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582368193; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=azaI9Z1KhM8/lw7j/PgNFEDmHsqFboPELAzPTTEImikUTHMHRERlRp43Ljk5qxXNtl +N4Tp2HdGfQJIn29rbE3bzM15k7Zvd6Hpdeh670heZNcOMkLmh39lvuuHDnegi+j8hWW Htu4WZwSScYrWrg3z1+O44hf48WWha4wrYx6ke7APyK65Z+/Z2+RBpFTVJAPQ2D6GqQ8 8fY6mqpT27LtgihD1C9wcRX+lWDADvUkdPNTJtw1arYs1lVcri9Qs0rr5anbvEkUJwQ1 L3+exzH8caDzS6dwVY7iKbUuJBEo+bX4dOBWL6n2+hRYKF6G8AHnkHqZffhbd8EM5dx4 vRBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=6Mi91va4caa/GKCiyMVu2+tPsKSl9AFgv7aLZiKWK5Q=; b=u7pSqX4AlqIdaGhISNzqdtgZtVKO/N9XYUE3yp6vJfm8OopVAKslTwJOPiXpiGxHw8 VrLEXs8WkWbqjKLiQfgwDRLYvGb6LT34o4aZPLRyqSlSWSLBzhGXxb3j92njkUV/j/IB yF20gJft2U5/TdGosYA2bWXJRmw3NsjmpY9YrI8vrivrtI8lBmzbLx8I8sQ3fK+aD11r BgR+L5A2SKbVf/UPKJu2bWt94LeuzQaXwb9Blcf/YjZKnIumtWjRsf5WpJuow1Y6bWxa yykc8I7+GnPvyq5QsuWMu4OPedUd1bIHMt+WYejtQxEvtyCWff1aVO0WZMJYHrOfXlaz zyDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t4si2737609otc.160.2020.02.22.02.43.00; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:43:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727152AbgBVKll (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 22 Feb 2020 05:41:41 -0500 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:60555 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726763AbgBVKll (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Feb 2020 05:41:41 -0500 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1j5SE4-0003bo-00; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:41:36 +0100 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9868BC0E42; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:41:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:41:24 +0100 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: YunQiang Su Cc: Paul Burton , linux-mips , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wayne.sun@cipunited.com, chris.wang@neocore.cn, Yunqiang Su Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Set MIPS status to Odd Fixes Message-ID: <20200222104124.GA4589@alpha.franken.de> References: <20200219191730.1277800-1-paulburton@kernel.org> <20200219191730.1277800-3-paulburton@kernel.org> <20200220112330.GA3053@alpha.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:11:08PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > I noticed that you are mainly working some old machines. > And recently years, there are some new machines from Ingenic, Loongson, MTK etc. > MIPS Inc also have some MIPSr6 IPs. > I think that you need some of these machines. sure, it would be helpfull. And with a reasonable price I have no problem buying a new machine. But IMHO it's not mandatory for a maintainer to have all supported hardware available. > In the last years, we see that the single maintainer is not enough as > people may quite busy. > Do you think that we need co-maintainers? Looking at the number of patches in arch/mips for the last few release cylces we were always in the range of 100-150 commits. So I don't see a need for a co-maintainer, but having backup maintainer(s) is a good thing. For me maintaining means - keep MIPS archicture alive (legacy and newer stuff) - collecting patches and integrating them into a git tree for pulling - send pull requests to Linus in a timely manner - review/comment patches - give guidance on how to do abstractions inside MIPS arch code Some personal background - doing Linux/MIPS coding since 1995 - worked as system architect for OS development with MIPS 4kec, 24k, 34k based embedded systems - working now for SUSE in kernel network driver area (with enough time for other open source projects) Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]