Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1555956ybv; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 09:27:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxHFwpmFw0bfkD1HoD+NB2CoSLdDMxJ5PNFbPNx/RoES/L1Nqsel9TCq907r0UMgxjUvM0y X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7511:: with SMTP id r17mr36670050otk.154.1582478834688; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 09:27:14 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582478834; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GwYUxHAvKVLRJ6lyuVc6a//g03PDn6DQ5Ib/onx4RpE/FKecH8z3sxu+T/H9cxDSSa EU2eFCtvi8otOmrAg2S+xZZzizBioIwt5AFBpk6DftKVhOas++4pvNZBE9BU7zgrW2dB C3kWCCzpSQe6bk2I8RU7w5ejfo2VDz/ImHfa8qt+DfwqKN60HHIQkYFagXdY7hzuhj9n +vaOvBbSLCJkz59Uzglz7chjhtxN3bpvnixXtq/4zCvZ/w+NS42uVyhjc2hHACD3lcBy 63B0w+JOjM+KW+BOlkvHF0vvIApRz6g3nLFio25jPWnBTtri3J1IN8KA7fR2cM5JvJlL sPOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=wEFj1G1NKftjgGPLShAKJwX/yS+125NZdJR3n/IjoD0=; b=O2Otu41L7oo7MUG2sR0bpc4H0BAPLFC9WKTztK/OZxjqWCUNmX2zj4X6Mlilp1KZUv xx7MgFA9oXyMtdwbPLyEyLgj515LDwT/Akjl1X0G2A2f59/TctqR3QyggsKju4CW3sd4 voMg4I9Tgp59/9veuBXYkZkMlsPq2UJpWyVcsyQM9jaNdecnHY9eEfoL08ncht0D0h5l c+zReND6rn/6DJNtSGwu+GgJKOnpyv9/MT8ll6g+NWsGLTNMMjmsYZ7QATJ83hF8b+fC tQuRa8We5y/LANZPVztdYJU5lYtgddo9LC4o9y8Azf3MMHuvk0EkwQ+eyYUJ7cnF3l49 Fiew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 194si3915001oii.2.2020.02.23.09.27.02; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 09:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727191AbgBWR0j (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:26:39 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:33282 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727164AbgBWR0i (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:26:38 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2020 09:26:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,476,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="229650051" Received: from ajbergin-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.23.203]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2020 09:26:31 -0800 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kai.svahn@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, josh@joshtriplett.org, luto@kernel.org, kai.huang@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: [PATCH v27 03/22] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV with PF_SGX Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 19:25:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20200223172559.6912-4-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200223172559.6912-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> References: <20200223172559.6912-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sean Christopherson Include SGX bit to the PF error codes and throw SIGSEGV with PF_SGX when a #PF with SGX set happens. CPU throws a #PF with the SGX bit in the event of Enclave Page Cache Map (EPCM) conflict. The EPCM is a CPU-internal table, which describes the properties for a enclave page. Enclaves are measured and signed software entities, which SGX hosts. [1] Although the primary purpose of the EPCM conflict checks is to prevent malicious accesses to an enclave, an illegit access can happen also for legit reasons. All SGX reserved memory, including EPCM is encrypted with a transient key that does not survive from the power transition. Throwing a SIGSEGV allows user space software react when this happens (e.g. rec-create the enclave, which was invalidated). [1] Intel SDM: 36.5.1 Enclave Page Cache Map (EPCM) Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h | 1 + arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h index ffa0dc8a535e..bb8d5ae74dbc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h @@ -174,5 +174,6 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code { X86_PF_RSVD = 1 << 3, X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4, X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5, + X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15, }; #endif /* _ASM_X86_TRAPS_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index fa4ea09593ab..dee9504cde79 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -1179,6 +1179,19 @@ access_error(unsigned long error_code, struct vm_area_struct *vma) if (error_code & X86_PF_PK) return 1; + /* + * Access is blocked by the Enclave Page Cache Map (EPCM), i.e. the + * access is allowed by the PTE but not the EPCM. This usually happens + * when the EPCM is yanked out from under us, e.g. by hardware after a + * suspend/resume cycle. In any case, software, i.e. the kernel, can't + * fix the source of the fault as the EPCM can't be directly modified by + * software. Handle the fault as an access error in order to signal + * userspace so that userspace can rebuild their enclave(s), even though + * userspace may not have actually violated access permissions. + */ + if (unlikely(error_code & X86_PF_SGX)) + return 1; + /* * Make sure to check the VMA so that we do not perform * faults just to hit a X86_PF_PK as soon as we fill in a -- 2.20.1