Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1608829ybv; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:40:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqziAGjYg4mCCAqkdHW1Wy1P1qpESH+sYRn4J3rlnws3VTQrWDe34GZ0C0LOfQsal2P7DEkc X-Received: by 2002:aca:5dc3:: with SMTP id r186mr10172238oib.137.1582483247543; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:40:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582483247; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jbXKAxTo5uCgl1ArC13nsk4bHVRq8Fk+uFNNBeLtym7bgn9AJ108eKJGkp5BtF0TcP 9odesiW0/azCXbzI3ytcYL5jMEDHJkYALDKZNlhQ09amYq9Tgv/CwEY0JAjNA8xEDYuu mOjKvgEgXhNg574GrPprsKDQTgZLaOkAIJ76fGTmQci2TCJyNMSXFp6Qeq2MP7+/EhJk rZJDZheltrT9n9WSsOIGEu3zT0cCAptWwCP0Mcg6Q22+mgBkpYkraevDlTP363Ie2hlL gCzT1HLETD4gd4xT8BJJLNCrlR/xVQC1w+oyVV3HiPfo0kkCfKx92q1a46f6cTX1v58A e4IQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=II5o6JujWFZkomE1NAlxosn4VA4h07FBHcsjjJS0OpM=; b=YyMVDYZzarpWgIQOU47Z+OCDY9r7FyssLOaXvccSKgIm0rnByIgqdlbf3vg4mxzppg kmsn1skRiSwdEiKitWN99bo2YNlQUhl4Yibef38CyGm3HVYrdr7j+xzg4ONHXMtCAQWq CrAaj1QJSM25Y59+yqUO6RVztBR47choclfFkwKL06JMuclHpva602eYZys+tiYXW7xW 5X9ccuaKidpWhH+ws8XKy0f33U15TdN0VkCiZ/gazGvkcLmbwLYla8gCMv3raIjdtgjd PowDElQNmwgvhdBGvracZR+e6ARNksExegzVPWqPV9Ijy54dU+9THFiwLCLLEU4ba4A3 89MQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v24si5036458otn.125.2020.02.23.10.40.36; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:40:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727201AbgBWSkO (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 23 Feb 2020 13:40:14 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:50504 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726208AbgBWSkO (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Feb 2020 13:40:14 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CAD101E; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E71D33F703; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:40:11 -0800 (PST) From: Qais Yousef To: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Dietmar Eggemann , Pavan Kondeti Cc: Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched/rt: Optimize cpupri_find on non-heterogenous systems Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:39:58 +0000 Message-Id: <20200223184001.14248-4-qais.yousef@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200223184001.14248-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> References: <20200223184001.14248-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org By introducing a new cpupri_find_fitness() function that takes the fitness_fn as an argument and only called when asym_system static key is enabled. cpupri_find() is now a wrapper function that calls cpupri_find_fitness() passing NULL as a fitness_fn, hence disabling the logic that handles fitness by default. Reported-by: Dietmar Eggemann Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware") LINK: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c0772fca-0a4b-c88d-fdf2-5715fcf8447b@arm.com/ Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef --- kernel/sched/cpupri.c | 10 ++++++++-- kernel/sched/cpupri.h | 6 ++++-- kernel/sched/rt.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c index 1bcfa1995550..dd3f16d1a04a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c @@ -94,8 +94,14 @@ static inline int __cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p, return 1; } +int cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p, + struct cpumask *lowest_mask) +{ + return cpupri_find_fitness(cp, p, lowest_mask, NULL); +} + /** - * cpupri_find - find the best (lowest-pri) CPU in the system + * cpupri_find_fitness - find the best (lowest-pri) CPU in the system * @cp: The cpupri context * @p: The task * @lowest_mask: A mask to fill in with selected CPUs (or NULL) @@ -111,7 +117,7 @@ static inline int __cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p, * * Return: (int)bool - CPUs were found */ -int cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p, +int cpupri_find_fitness(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *lowest_mask, bool (*fitness_fn)(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)) { diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.h b/kernel/sched/cpupri.h index 32dd520db11f..efbb492bb94c 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.h +++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.h @@ -19,8 +19,10 @@ struct cpupri { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP int cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p, - struct cpumask *lowest_mask, - bool (*fitness_fn)(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)); + struct cpumask *lowest_mask); +int cpupri_find_fitness(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p, + struct cpumask *lowest_mask, + bool (*fitness_fn)(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)); void cpupri_set(struct cpupri *cp, int cpu, int pri); int cpupri_init(struct cpupri *cp); void cpupri_cleanup(struct cpupri *cp); diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index 2c3fae637cef..e48d7c215aee 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * let's hope p can move out. */ if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1 || - !cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, NULL, NULL)) + !cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, NULL)) return; /* @@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else. */ if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1 && - cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, p, NULL, NULL)) + cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, p, NULL)) return; /* @@ -1691,6 +1691,7 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task) struct cpumask *lowest_mask = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask); int this_cpu = smp_processor_id(); int cpu = task_cpu(task); + int ret; /* Make sure the mask is initialized first */ if (unlikely(!lowest_mask)) @@ -1699,8 +1700,22 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task) if (task->nr_cpus_allowed == 1) return -1; /* No other targets possible */ - if (!cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpupri, task, lowest_mask, - rt_task_fits_capacity)) + /* + * If we're on asym system ensure we consider the different capacities + * of the CPUs when searching for the lowest_mask. + */ + if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity)) { + + ret = cpupri_find_fitness(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpupri, + task, lowest_mask, + rt_task_fits_capacity); + } else { + + ret = cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpupri, + task, lowest_mask); + } + + if (!ret) return -1; /* No targets found */ /* -- 2.17.1