Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] extcon: palmas: hide error messages if gpio returns
 -EPROBE_DEFER
To:     Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Cc:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org,
        kernel@pyra-handheld.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Organization: Samsung Electronics
Message-ID: <1cf484d9-572c-ea19-49d6-cd4cf61c9965@samsung.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:12:08 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101
        Thunderbird/59.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200221074740.GA44103@lenoch>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 101P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <CGME20200217133832epcas1p329af393e88fa76189ca141d2534f9ad2@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
        <d5c2826a5f00fcaee62f00662ae2a44dc4a5395d.1581946695.git.hns@goldelico.com>
        <b2655a58-6541-a2c9-c44d-536e5cef1ee3@samsung.com>
        <20200218102140.GA193069@lenoch>
        <cbee6f0b-f268-2e77-f7b7-f19114fdf178@samsung.com>
        <20200218104810.GA194120@lenoch>
        <34f3cd11-321b-9aab-31a7-a3fb03691980@samsung.com>
        <20200221074740.GA44103@lenoch>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2/21/20 4:47 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:09:16PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2/18/20 7:48 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:35:47PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> On 2/18/20 7:21 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/17/20 10:38 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>>>>>> If the gpios are probed after this driver (e.g. if they
>>>>>>> come from an i2c expander) there is no need to print an
>>>>>>> error message.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>>>>>> index edc5016f46f1..cea58d0cb457 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>>>>>> @@ -205,14 +205,18 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  	palmas_usb->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "id",
>>>>>>>  							GPIOD_IN);
>>>>>>> -	if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) {
>>>>>>> +	if (PTR_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>>>>>>> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>
>>> Here we returned...
>>
>> hmm. you better to suggest the result of cocci script
>> to understand why it is matter.
> 
> You can browse similar fixes online :)
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?qt=grep&q=else+after+return
> 

As you commented, please share the result
of cocci or checkpatch warning. It is simple to finish
this discussion. 

As I commented on other reply,
"I think that my suggestion is better because 'if' and 'else if'
check the error state of same 'palmas_usb->id_gpiod' variable.

If 'if' and 'else if' checks the different variable,
your suggestion is better."


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics