Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:34:34 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 1/5] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a:
 delete extraneous #interrupt-cells for ENETC RCIE
Message-ID: <20200224063432.GL27688@dragon>
References: <20200219151259.14273-1-olteanv@gmail.com>
 <20200219151259.14273-2-olteanv@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200219151259.14273-2-olteanv@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:12:55PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> This specifier overrides the interrupt specifier with 3 cells from gic
> (/interrupt-controller@6000000), but in fact ENETC is not an interrupt
> controller, so the property is bogus.
> 
> Interrupts used by the children of the ENETC RCIE must use the full
> 3-cell specifier required by the GIC.
> 
> The issue has no functional consequence so there is no real reason to
> port the patch to stable trees.
> 
> Fixes: 927d7f857542 ("arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: Add PCI IERC node and ENETC endpoints")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Prefix 'arm64: dts: ls1028a: ...' should be already clear enough.

Shawn