Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2491376ybv; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 06:15:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjfxAUunzBIZS3OZeFmaAj+j2vq0mPaLFG+SbxsE/k/kP+jp7wcoLEEo5IQ0d0wRZF8t7U X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6b84:: with SMTP id b4mr40725048otq.190.1582553751088; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 06:15:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582553751; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Qpc9/xQn3c9vfTuCCLRCQL61g2jaleQRAE7/XvHn8sk7jpRCJw40V3BvIlCW8exSaJ oWVE/K0uQ2BxoA5qVkaloCfQorPbQH1PKmg8LxnGvXN+DZTDuc91jWO5JzZkEpT00qG0 2gAPIzd+eGqfbhQ6WGTNpr8QmWinJ072WdrLIeJxnNrCmJCv37ILAdqto6IVy6R6+wTK yTKKTWw2yeiCZR3VODfv6lGAUd1n45kJtiCJqUD0d3qNQloERT3CVmO3INXxIpxPuV8R 0NmmVj6lsadqVdA/9o89jz4Q4gD7upqcSLmcBR7dnTZgB+8PNJM6Rx2NLEtzMK0MTumO Ugrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=ichIEIUq04C6mrjG/Wgqy3ZY1uj0LzsxVmdbEqXNaxA=; b=SyT9uk4pMsjcQcd9ABOR/GD88c2i+QCx1sY5vvy/p4o0Hz1NIcZFpm8ch4gR7v/kwL XrbimRY2dwRcZX8PSIK32dp9m5jgPId5DRIP6v80hvGrCJajQUTo00f2H4XmF5wlkxsD vSnA3+7EQttZWUy1vsECToY7lCeQA414bTpZwIU7SZzPxPM3UBaPFr+HF6YapA/d9tvB NbQqDrNvY/dXlCEi7WGEDpci1PSjKfso1wmOeG5Num4ISyY87AVuMFXa47T95HnnOdJG uMVJlJQcWB4cly+vYg6zMTTa3IRsnZqo3imlMbszt9NSnUSKU5HxHIdqgYAmiX8cyZ4E +qzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=gSbmxsj0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w7si5305214oie.196.2020.02.24.06.15.39; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 06:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=gSbmxsj0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727740AbgBXOP0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:15:26 -0500 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:53484 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727489AbgBXOPZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:15:25 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01OEFNq1097309; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:15:23 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1582553723; bh=ichIEIUq04C6mrjG/Wgqy3ZY1uj0LzsxVmdbEqXNaxA=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gSbmxsj0XbjIcynO7WKdmhAb9jaiM0I3JxaLKE0cuO3n6K71W11AxdEnyxiCtYu7t ufAam7z24UGfsHf/T4v4LZBjAA4BT9Fz9NEmOi2lSrvznkNqEpcXfQJUKnrl4R1Bst 0L/dGNiM5iDF6MjlnaDArBHFK2rT0GYOH3xFZfoM= Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (dlee114.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.25]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01OEFNEU085157; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:15:23 -0600 Received: from DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:15:23 -0600 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:15:23 -0600 Received: from [10.250.77.18] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01OEFMAN036321; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:15:22 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 04/15] remoteproc/omap: Add support to parse internal memories from DT To: Tero Kristo , , , , CC: , , References: <20200221101936.16833-1-t-kristo@ti.com> <20200221101936.16833-5-t-kristo@ti.com> From: "Andrew F. Davis" Message-ID: <7de4914a-a5c6-b108-af10-45283aabddc7@ti.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:15:22 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200221101936.16833-5-t-kristo@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/21/20 5:19 AM, Tero Kristo wrote: > From: Suman Anna > > The OMAP remoteproc driver has been enhanced to parse and store > the kernel mappings for different internal RAM memories that may > be present within each remote processor IP subsystem. Different > devices have varying memories present on current SoCs. The current > support handles the L2RAM for all IPU devices on OMAP4+ SoCs. The > DSPs on OMAP4/OMAP5 only have Unicaches and do not have any L1 or > L2 RAM memories. > > IPUs are expected to have the L2RAM at a fixed device address of > 0x20000000, based on the current limitations on Attribute MMU > configurations. > > NOTE: > The current logic doesn't handle the parsing of memories for DRA7 > remoteproc devices, and will be added alongside the DRA7 support. > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna > [t-kristo: converted to parse mem names / device addresses from pdata] > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo > --- > drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c > index 64b559caadff..4f92b069f5d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c > @@ -39,11 +39,27 @@ struct omap_rproc_boot_data { > unsigned int boot_reg; > }; > > +/** > + * struct omap_rproc_mem - internal memory structure > + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region > + * @bus_addr: bus address used to access the memory region > + * @dev_addr: device address of the memory region from DSP view > + * @size: size of the memory region > + */ > +struct omap_rproc_mem { > + void __iomem *cpu_addr; > + phys_addr_t bus_addr; > + u32 dev_addr; > + size_t size; > +}; > + > /** > * struct omap_rproc - omap remote processor state > * @mbox: mailbox channel handle > * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel > * @boot_data: boot data structure for setting processor boot address > + * @mem: internal memory regions data > + * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions > * @rproc: rproc handle > * @reset: reset handle > */ > @@ -51,16 +67,30 @@ struct omap_rproc { > struct mbox_chan *mbox; > struct mbox_client client; > struct omap_rproc_boot_data *boot_data; > + struct omap_rproc_mem *mem; > + int num_mems; > struct rproc *rproc; > struct reset_control *reset; > }; > > +/** > + * struct omap_rproc_mem_data - memory definitions for an omap remote processor > + * @name: name for this memory entry > + * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry > + */ > +struct omap_rproc_mem_data { > + const char *name; > + const u32 dev_addr; > +}; > + > /** > * struct omap_rproc_dev_data - device data for the omap remote processor > * @device_name: device name of the remote processor > + * @mems: memory definitions for this remote processor > */ > struct omap_rproc_dev_data { > const char *device_name; > + const struct omap_rproc_mem_data *mems; > }; > > /** > @@ -223,12 +253,18 @@ static const struct rproc_ops omap_rproc_ops = { > .kick = omap_rproc_kick, > }; > > +static const struct omap_rproc_mem_data ipu_mems[] = { > + { .name = "l2ram", .dev_addr = 0x20000000 }, > + { }, > +}; > + > static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap4_dsp_dev_data = { > .device_name = "dsp", > }; > > static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap4_ipu_dev_data = { > .device_name = "ipu", > + .mems = ipu_mems, > }; > > static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap5_dsp_dev_data = { > @@ -237,6 +273,7 @@ static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap5_dsp_dev_data = { > > static const struct omap_rproc_dev_data omap5_ipu_dev_data = { > .device_name = "ipu", > + .mems = ipu_mems, > }; > > static const struct of_device_id omap_rproc_of_match[] = { > @@ -311,6 +348,54 @@ static int omap_rproc_get_boot_data(struct platform_device *pdev, > return 0; > } > > +static int omap_rproc_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, > + struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv; 'rproc' is only used to get 'oproc', why not just pass in 'oproc'? > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + const struct omap_rproc_dev_data *data; > + struct resource *res; > + int num_mems; > + int i; > + > + data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); just use 'dev' > + if (!data) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + if (!data->mems) > + return 0; > + > + for (num_mems = 0; data->mems[num_mems].name; num_mems++) > + ; > + > + oproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_mems, sizeof(*oproc->mem), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!oproc->mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) { > + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, > + data->mems[i].name); > + oproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > + if (IS_ERR(oproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse and map %s memory\n", > + data->mems[i].name); > + return PTR_ERR(oproc->mem[i].cpu_addr); > + } > + oproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start; > + oproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr; > + oproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res); > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%x va %pK da 0x%x\n", > + data->mems[i].name, &oproc->mem[i].bus_addr, > + oproc->mem[i].size, oproc->mem[i].cpu_addr, I'm not a fan of printing kernel virtual addresses, but not a blocker. > + oproc->mem[i].dev_addr); > + } > + oproc->num_mems = num_mems; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int omap_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > @@ -350,6 +435,10 @@ static int omap_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* All existing OMAP IPU and DSP processors have an MMU */ > rproc->has_iommu = true; > > + ret = omap_rproc_of_get_internal_memories(pdev, rproc); This only looks to be used for the da_to_va() in the next patch, could these be combined? As above not a big deal, so for this patch and the whole series: Reviewed-by: Andrew F. Davis > + if (ret) > + goto free_rproc; > + > ret = omap_rproc_get_boot_data(pdev, rproc); > if (ret) > goto free_rproc; >