Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2622201ybv; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:31:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZAMzSYe/s9Npr6q6pxzGDT5M0/eKzdPPB/ouUuxKfOM9T8Pt72a7rA5nIg0hse9EyOVi2 X-Received: by 2002:aca:4f4c:: with SMTP id d73mr13483410oib.107.1582561916396; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:31:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582561916; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YfkRAgIw2nrrIHcP5JvRj3J5wbsWgvu+WxHzEWe/nS8sAAZYK4XXftE8nwy0degDkr gICfcOJzvjRSL9/PNMdMebvU9ur952pBppQe2F+XpwjJmkH4mwhHREZyyAYleK8LfQXR Gpu2V7rkBrHAvbFcKGQ9OfdngH4cUt95s/yetHhno6TTqgQmQrtKFZJKVfLyqHtzeaP0 jG+pzBA/imDr5HtI4d81sd3FU4aiJi85h3hayrfVRwbZ2FR9Ts5QF3YCzzzg2pg3VC/9 tlAam7JXPVilMlNWU9xilFWKJgwgPedFZ6TvHCOlXM7AqiiKvfHGqprNclJh7vS2h7da XY3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=xem4drnPDd8k7qViggHSFSJ7AemW1N1BFXvKx2gRFfM=; b=t2gGXEyPKv697MITO05kA1YPfBIiuo2CD7BGg+2a9huR0TWjI5/OKHWYeldoNlYBd2 GfeMImfu8f+qihscRfhGicYGrZ49AcKk6U+dYYUd2Mwz5bMjG1zbnh4YNj1ZVBjJgHzR al8phMjBcKwNKx8Ik4wURV9ItT0jSHGfj42GoBZ9vea5VaOaOl65vvMfEQeQ8dYqCfNd ysAMHNKnEySa5MH3C2SSFzpk1vSlrFjeJwlTMAQSD6thND/hjdVNgvNeKaDUz6Xf1n2w AbIuRheoQH4bZG1JLKXiB1o6gVrEG3+0+8CIVvmI4PFRFnXDTxPwWk5zf0Kb8npZXNXF zicw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z15si6433604oti.126.2020.02.24.08.31.44; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:31:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727964AbgBXQa3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:30:29 -0500 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:47882 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727177AbgBXQa2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:30:28 -0500 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6Gcl-0004et-I3; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:30:27 -0700 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1j6Gcj-00087b-GZ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:30:26 -0700 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux API , Linux FS Devel , Linux Security Module , Akinobu Mita , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Micay , Djalal Harouni , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "J . Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Oleg Nesterov , Solar Designer , Alexey Gladkov References: <20200210150519.538333-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> <87v9odlxbr.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212144921.sykucj4mekcziicz@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6> <87tv3vkg1a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87v9obipk9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200212200335.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212203833.GQ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200212204124.GR23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87lfp7h422.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pnejf6fz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:28:22 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871rqk2brn.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:25:16 -0600") Message-ID: <87eeuk0x21.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1j6Gcj-00087b-GZ;;;mid=<87eeuk0x21.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/swQCQNy2YwWznsTE8zPB0PTznWyDneD8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, XMGappySubj_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4998] * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1256 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (0.2%), b_tie_ro: 2.1 (0.2%), parse: 1.05 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (1.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 2.2 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 30 (2.4%), tests_pri_-950: 2.0 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.43 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 49 (3.9%), check_bayes: 47 (3.8%), b_tokenize: 18 (1.4%), b_tok_get_all: 18 (1.4%), b_comp_prob: 2.7 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 4.5 (0.4%), b_finish: 0.88 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 1142 (90.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.96 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.2 (0.3%), poll_dns_idle: 0.52 (0.0%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 11 (0.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] proc: Use d_invalidate in proc_prune_siblings_dcache X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The function d_prune_aliases has the problem that it will only prune aliases thare are completely unused. It will not remove aliases for the dcache or even think of removing mounts from the dcache. For that behavior d_invalidate is needed. To use d_invalidate replace d_prune_aliases with d_find_alias followed by d_invalidate and dput. For completeness the directory and the non-directory cases are separated because in theory (although not in currently in practice for proc) directories can only ever have a single dentry while non-directories can have hardlinks and thus multiple dentries. As part of this separation use d_find_any_alias for directories to spare d_find_alias the extra work of doing that. Plus the differences between d_find_any_alias and d_find_alias makes it clear why the directory and non-directory code and not share code. To make it clear these routines now invalidate dentries rename proc_prune_siblings_dache to proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache, and rename proc_sys_prune_dcache proc_sys_invalidate_dcache. V2: Split the directory and non-directory cases. To make this code robust to future changes in proc. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/proc/inode.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- fs/proc/internal.h | 2 +- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index fa2dc732cd77..ba6acd300ce1 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void __init proc_init_kmemcache(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) >= SIZEOF_PDE); } -void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) +void proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) { struct inode *inode; struct proc_inode *ei; @@ -137,7 +137,19 @@ void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock) continue; } - d_prune_aliases(inode); + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { + struct dentry *dir = d_find_any_alias(inode); + if (dir) { + d_invalidate(dir); + dput(dir); + } + } else { + struct dentry *dentry; + while ((dentry = d_find_alias(inode))) { + d_invalidate(dentry); + dput(dentry); + } + } iput(inode); rcu_read_lock(); diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index ba9a991824a5..fd470172675f 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ extern const struct inode_operations proc_pid_link_inode_operations; extern const struct super_operations proc_sops; void proc_init_kmemcache(void); -void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock); +void proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock); void set_proc_pid_nlink(void); extern struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *, struct proc_dir_entry *); extern void proc_entry_rundown(struct proc_dir_entry *); diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c index 5da9d7f7ae34..b6f5d459b087 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c @@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ static void unuse_table(struct ctl_table_header *p) complete(p->unregistering); } -static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head) +static void proc_sys_invalidate_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head) { - proc_prune_siblings_dcache(&head->inodes, &sysctl_lock); + proc_invalidate_siblings_dcache(&head->inodes, &sysctl_lock); } /* called under sysctl_lock, will reacquire if has to wait */ @@ -291,10 +291,10 @@ static void start_unregistering(struct ctl_table_header *p) spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); } /* - * Prune dentries for unregistered sysctls: namespaced sysctls + * Invalidate dentries for unregistered sysctls: namespaced sysctls * can have duplicate names and contaminate dcache very badly. */ - proc_sys_prune_dcache(p); + proc_sys_invalidate_dcache(p); /* * do not remove from the list until nobody holds it; walking the * list in do_sysctl() relies on that. -- 2.25.0