Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2629455ybv; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:39:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzsx4kXOih9j75TebvljqcUP9KgEApSvMknyPdXM+ISuaKFLPwYw+C/QZFXk8uZE4PZ3Aiv X-Received: by 2002:aca:ad11:: with SMTP id w17mr13611930oie.85.1582562383833; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:39:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582562383; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mQzHYxJXrTvlJ1FOQi6lcBj00rX6SEy5e5no8Ys0qhbwaN6C9l5BqYF6yJQ7aL2WFQ lsAvkq3UlDpJR29ZapeqEEl7f0USo491UJHpx2HAsSgIsgemUy2dP6JuO/LsZlAkvMsz xEflKkV9mxu1+Q5MjF88QEIs7ZFFOcV9AxWTQnp2q08gHCT9HeR6SH3fsyeD7xagNu77 0mVSwohJ3ZOlJX/Le5USPaz52hj0C63qtAnf9Iso4ZEJ0/M3HhrAfuA5zqpB+U1Baw4L HM3kamzLTJO/qgB/CIJ1kW9EbdXnMz3yNOFhomyw+joMB4rSYUFnlYuE0/+s00y+0Tn1 5OQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=+NN9MAfrZaaevKYP5O1FAMudg54Clf+1OZPRnIzw+dw=; b=r98onu35ztpZYZ2aGqnu5qlxESccHi70PqpeT9vG4uVCvQ1ESY/AtiXhdlVIGhsnDg 8xbsrXRwnIP5kdQbj2Di5mKitGtnmGFPP9RTlGEgQw/Gk0CX3DWZseMezTJivpdhMSgF iE6qNOZYhFb0iN6yuBALUbOAO6Bep46Nq7bgFdrE6FfLzwH7Iv5a3Kt1RzLg10ZP91dp TLRg67hpPbAvEbamGm6prfqmVp5NLNIuEm0DsIlkYj2iOarYGAts112w3fw77wCoFeNh OixHF1/UUbBCslLsn9d4r7eJt4/6zdi/o5FlbAz/2BACIgRiEKl3WMLpXETTwUh+SN3A FTGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l17si6418399otp.248.2020.02.24.08.39.30; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727802AbgBXQiI (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:38:08 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42228 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727160AbgBXQiI (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:38:08 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8912920637; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:38:05 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Yiwei Zhang Cc: mingo@redhat.com, Greg KH , elder@kernel.org, federico.vaga@cern.ch, tony.luck@intel.com, vilhelm.gray@gmail.com, Linus Walleij , tglx@linutronix.de, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Prahlad Kilambi , Joel Fernandes , android-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpu/trace: add gpu memory tracepoints Message-ID: <20200224113805.134f8b95@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20200212222922.5dfa9f36@oasis.local.home> <20200213042331.157606-1-zzyiwei@google.com> <20200213090308.223f3f20@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:31:11 -0800 Yiwei Zhang wrote: > Dear gpu and tracing owners, > > It's been a while and this is just a gentle and friendly re-ping for > review of this small patch. I guess the question is what tree should this go through. I usually only take tracing infrastructure changes and leave topic specific tracing for those that maintain the topics. I'm fine with taking this through my tree if I get a bunch of acked/reviewed by from other maintainers. -- Steve