Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
References: <20200224141142.25445-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> <20200224141142.25445-6-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To:     Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
        lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] cpufreq: add function to get the hardware max frequency
In-reply-to: <20200224141142.25445-6-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:44:03 +0000
Message-ID: <jhjlforygek.fsf@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Ionela Voinescu writes:

> Add weak function to return the hardware maximum frequency of a CPU,
> with the default implementation returning cpuinfo.max_freq, which is
> the best information we can generically get from the cpufreq framework.
>
> The default can be overwritten by a strong function in platforms
> that want to provide an alternative implementation, with more accurate
> information, obtained either from hardware or firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>